Laparoscopic transabdominal isthmic cerclage in a case of cervical agenesis and a successful pregnancy with ICSI
© Springer-Verlag Berlin / Heidelberg 2006
Received: 8 March 2006
Accepted: 6 May 2006
Published: 27 July 2006
The objective was to construct a laparoscopic transabdominal isthmic cerclage in a patient with cervical agenesis at Kadir Has University, Metropolitan Florence Nightingale Hospital. A 39-year-old woman diagnosed with primary infertility due to cervical agenesis was admitted to our hospital because of recurrent assisted reproductive technique (ART) failures. She underwent three operations for acute abdominal pain due to endometriosis and pyometra. There was a tiny fistula-like opening at the level of the isthmus, through which menstrual blood passed. Three intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts with transmyometrial transfer had failed at three different IVF centres. We performed a laparoscopic transabdominal isthmic cerclage to prevent a miscarriage due to a clinical condition similar to cervical insufficiency and then an ICSI procedure was performed. We delivered a healthy baby weighing 3,200 g by Caesarean section. We left the cerclage in place for subsequent pregnancies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of laparoscopic isthmic cerclage for the prevention of a clinical condition similar to cervical insufficiency in cervical agenesis that has resulted in a term pregnancy after ICSI.
Cervical incompetence has been acknowledged as a significant entity predisposing patients to second trimester miscarriage. Various surgical techniques have been used to prolong pregnancy and improve prenatal outcome. These include transvaginal and transabdominal cervical cerclage applied preconceptionally or during pregnancy.
Here we report a case of 39-year-old-woman with cervical agenesis and infertility, in which laparoscopic isthmic placement of cerclage was performed before embryo transfer, resulting in a successful pregnancy.
A 39-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of primary infertility. When she was 15 years old, she consulted a gynaecologist because of acute abdominal pain. In her gynaecological examination, the cervix uteri could not be visualised and in the ultrasonographic examination bilateral endometriomas and haematometra were seen. A laparotomic cystectomy was performed and an incision was made at the level of the isthmus to let menstrual bleeding occur. During her reproductive period, she suffered from acute abdominal pain and she underwent three operations for pyometra and haematometra, and the incision was repeated for patency of the blocked passage. She had been married for 20 years and was unable to achieve a spontaneous pregnancy. In 1999, the couple attended an infertility clinic and her husband’s spermiogram revealed severe oligospermia. In her gynaecologic examination, the cervix could not be visualised and it was noted that the vaginal cuff had a post-hysterectomy appearance. A diagnostic laparoscopy was carried out and severe adhesions were reported because of endometriosis and laparotomies. Three cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and transmyometrial embryo transfer were performed. Although three or four embryos of good quality were transferred at every attempt, pregnancy was not achieved. In a university hospital, it was concluded that the couple could never have a baby because of cervical agenesis.
The patient was evaluated at our centre in January 2004. We performed a gynaecologic examination, but were unable to see the cervix. We invited the patient to be re-examined at the beginning of her menstrual period in order to see where the blood was going. She had severe dysmenorrhoea because of the narrow opening at the right side of the vaginal end. The fistula-like opening probably occurred because of the repeated incisions at the level of the isthmus. We decided to place an isthmic cerclage before IVF for a successful outcome.
After confirming that the ligature was in an appropriate place at the isthmus, the ends of the ligature were knotted. The peritoneum was sutured over the knot and the laparoscopy was finalised following haemostasis. The suture was left in place for subsequent pregnancies.
Two months later, we started controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Puregon; Organon, Altunizade, Turkey) at 200 IU/day. We obtained 20 oocytes and 14 of them were metaphase II. We transferred two embryos on the 3rd day; both of them were reported to be Grade 1. The beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) level on the 11th day of embryo transfer was 223 mIU/ml. During pregnancy, in the 32nd gestational week, there was a risk of pre-term labour, after which only bed rest was recommended. The antenatal follow-up showed no abnormality and she delivered a healthy male baby weighing 3,200 g in the 38th gestational week by Caesarean section.
Cervical incompetence is a premature dilatation of the cervix leading to recurrent mid-trimester pregnancy loss or early premature labour. It is thought that the condition is caused by a defect in the strength of the cervical tissue either congenitally or acquired, resulting in the inability to maintain a pregnancy . The treatment consists of placing a purse string suture around the cervix. The conventional method is placing the sutures vaginally, but it might not be possible in extremely short, deformed and scarred cervices or in the absence of a cervix. Abdominal cerclage has been advocated by several authors to overcome this problem.
Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic abdominal cerclage
Number of Cases
Cerclage in pregnancy
Al-Fadhli and Tulandi 
One term pregnancy, one not pregnant
Darwish and Hassan 
Eight failed cervical cerclages
Live birth, 37 weeks
Gallot et al 
26, 35, 29
Failed cervical cerclages
Two live births at 38 weeks; one not pregnant
Henricus et al. 
Short cervix after wide excision followed by immature delivery
Live baby with intrauterine growth restriction, 37 weeks
Ind and Mason 
Two failed cervical cerclages
Lessor et al 
Failed cerclage, diethylstilbestrol exposed, and mid-trimester miscarriage
Live birth, 35 weeks
Mingione et al. 
Absent or short cervix or failed cervical cerclages
Ten term live births, one elective delivery at 34.5 weeks
Scibetta et al. 
Absence of exocervix following cone biopsy
Live birth, 38.5 weeks
Live birth, 38.5 weeks
In 1965, Benson and Durfee first described the transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage by laparotomy in a group of women with cervical incompetence in whom a conventional transvaginal procedure was impossible . Since then, these operations have been performed during pregnancy or before conception to prevent cervical insufficiency [4, 5]. A less invasive approach is laparoscopic abdominal cerclage, which has the advantages of a laparoscopic procedure including no hospitalisation, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery .
In 1998, Scibetta and colleagues described the first case of the successful use of an interval laparoscopic technique for transabdominal cerclage placement, so as to avoid the need to resort to a laparotomy during the pregnant or non-pregnant state , but this case and all subsequent cases had normal cervical anatomy.
Gallot and colleagues reported the use of laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in three women with a history of recurrent miscarriages and failed cerclage. All procedures were successful and two of them became pregnant within 4 months, delivering by Caesarean section at 38 weeks’ gestation .
In the case presented, the failure of previous assisted reproductive technique (ART) cycles can be attributed to transmyometrial transfer, which caused bleeding. We created an artificial cervical canal through which we carried out the transfer of the embryos. There is only one study in the literature reporting transvaginal cerclage being performed in cases of severe cervical hypoplasia under ultrasound guidance . To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of transabdominal laparoscopic isthmic cerclage performed for cervical agenesis that has resulted in a successful pregnancy and a healthy baby following ICSI.
We thank Russell Fraser for checking the English of this manuscript.
- Ludmir J (1998) Sonographic detection of cervical incompetence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 31:101–109Google Scholar
- Al-Fadhli R, Tulandi T (2004) Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 31:497–504PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benson RC, Durfee RB (1965) Transabdominal cervicouterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol 25:145–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mingione MJ, Scibetta JJ, Sanko SR, Phipps WR (2003) Clinical outcomes following interval laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage placement: case series. Hum Reprod 18:1716–1719PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Groom KM, Jones BA, Edmonds DK, Bennett PR (2004) Preconception transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:230–234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scibetta JJ, Sanko SR, Phipps WR (1998) Laparoscopic transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Fertil Steril 69:161–163PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gallot D, Savary D, Laurichesse H, Bournazeau JA, Amblard J, Lemery D (2003) Experience with three cases of laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage and two subsequent pregnancies. BJOG 110:696–700PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludmir J, Jackson GM, Samuels P (1991) Transvaginal cerclage under ultrasound guidance in cases of severe cervical hypoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 78:1067–1072PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darwish A, Hassan Z (2002) Feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage in the second trimester. Gynaecol Endosc 11:327–329View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brölmann HAM, Oei SG (2000) The laparoscopic approach of transabdominal cerclage of the uterine cervix in case of cervical incompetence. Gynaecol Endosc 9:191–194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ind T, Mason P (2000) Endoscopic trans-abdominal cervical cerclage. Gynaecol Endosc 9:199–200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lessor KB, Childers JM, Surwit EA (1998) Transabdominal cerclage: a laparoscopic approach. Obstet Gynecol 91:855–856View ArticleGoogle Scholar