Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of recently published papers on transvaginal laparoscopy

From: Transvaginal access: a safe technique for tubo-ovarian exploration in infertility? Review of the literature

 

Year

Number

Access

Complications

1. van Tetering et al. [2]

2007

271

96%

2 rectum/2 bleed/1 susp. PID

2. Mgaloblishvili et al. [22]

2007

702

0

3. Sobek et al. [23]

2007

469

99%

2 bowel

4. Kowalczyk et al. [24]

2006

56

100%

0

5. El-Shalakany et al. [25]

2006

22

95.5%

0

6. Nohuz et al. [26]

2006

229

88.6%

2 bowel, 2 hematoma, 1 PID

7. Suzuki et al. [27]

2005

130

0

8. Zeyneloğlu et al. [28]

2005

13

77%

0

9. Tanos et al. [29] (five centers)

2005

78

70–100%

1 bowel, 1 bleed

10. Hu et al. [30]

2004

46

0

11. Kalliola [31]

2003

65

89%

1 bleed, 1 bradycard

12. Shibahara et al. [32]

2003

32

0

13. Abad et al. [33]

2003

20

95%

0

14. Moore et al. [34]

2003

109

93%

1 retrofl. uterus

15. Fujiwara et al. [35]

2003

36

93%

0

16. Watrelot et al. [36]

2003

92

94.5%

1 rectal, 1 post wall

17. Casa et al. [37]

2002

60

93%

0

18. Jónsdóttir and Lundorff [38]

2002

120

93%

0

19. Cicinelli et al. [39]

2001

23

95%

0

20. Moore and Cohen [40]

2001

40

93%

0

21. Nawroth et al. [41]

2001

43

93%

0

22. Sobkiewicz et al. [42]

2001

12

100%

0

23. Dechaud et al. [43]

2001

23

95.7%

1 post wall

24. Shibahara et al. [44]

2001

41

92.7%

0

25. Takeuchi et al. [45]

2001

35

94.3%

1 rectal serosa

26. Darai et al. [46]

2000

60

90.2%

1 rectal

27. Bajzak et al. [47]

2000

15

0