Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence of postdrilling adhesions in this study versus some published studies

From: Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study

Authors

Year

Sample size

Adhesions/second look (%)

Remarks

Weise et al. [27]

1991

39

7/26 (26.9%)

Gurgan et al. [28]

1991

7

6/7 (85.7%)

Dabirashrafi et al. [29]

1991

31

2/12 (16.6%)

Mild to moderate

Naether and Fischer [30]

1993

199

12/62 (19%)

The incidence reduced to 16.6% with the use of abdominal lavage

Naether et al. [31]

1993

133

7/26 (26.9%)

Greenblatt and Casper [11]

1993

8

8/8 (100%)

7/8 (87.5%) got pregnant

Saravelos and Li [32]

1996

21

7/21 (33%)

Unilateral: 3/21 (14%)

Bilateral: 4/21 (19%)

Felemban et al. [33]

2000

112

4/15 (26.6%)

Periovarian adhesions

Mercorio et al. [24]

2007

90

54/90 (60%)

Unilateral: 25/54 (46.3%)

Bilateral: 29/54 (53.7%)

Current study

2008

347

40/51 (78.4%)

Unilateral: 11 (27.5%)

Bilateral: 29 (56.8%)

Periovarian: 47/51 (92%)