Laparoscopic resection of cystic adenomyosis in a teenager with arcurate uterus
© Springer-Verlag 2009
Received: 28 May 2009
Accepted: 29 June 2009
Published: 17 July 2009
Whereas diffuse adenomyosis is a common finding in parous women, cystic adenomyosis causing severe dysmenorrhoea is very rarely reported and possibly under-diagnosed, particularly in adolescents. We report a case of juvenile cystic adenomyosis in a 19-year-old nulliparous patient presenting with secondary dysmenorrhoea and non-cyclical pain. A 20-mm adenomyotic cyst in the fundal myometrium was successfully excised laparoscopically by modified myomectomy. It is mandatory to take persistent primary and early secondary dysmenorrhoea seriously, especially after poor response to medical treatment and to have a low threshold for further investigations, because a diagnosis of cystic adenomyosis requires targeted therapeutic intervention.
KeywordsJuvenile cystic adenomyosis Adenomyoma Uterine cyst Laparoscopic surgery Arcuate uterus Modified myomectomy
Diffuse adenomyosis is typically present in up to 20% of hysterectomy specimens of parous women over the age of 30, but circumscribed forms, such as solid or cystic adenomyoma, also termed cystic adenomyosis, are less frequent. Cystic adenomyosis can be divided into an adult form, which is present in 5–7% of hysterectomy fibroid uteri  and often associated with the diffuse subtype, and a juvenile form seen in nulliparous women between 13 and 20 years of age, for which the true incidence is not known; less than ten cases have been reported to date [2–9], most of them in Japan. Although the aetiology is still a cause for debate, the adult form appears to result from traumatic breech of the interface between the endometrium and the myometrium, for instance after uterine instrumentation followed by bleeding into dispersed endometrial glands, which become dilated and turn into cystic spaces of typically less than 5 mm in diameter. In contrast, the juvenile form is thought to result from a congenital defect of the development of the Müllerian duct, which appears to lead to larger cystic spaces lined with endometrium between 1 and 3 cm in diameter . The early presentation of pain soon after menarche may mislead clinicians into making the diagnosis of functional, primary dysmenorrhoea; further differential diagnoses include ovarian endometriomata, degenerative uterine fibroids and bicornuate uterus with a non-communicating uterine horn.
A 19-year-old nulliparous woman presented with an 18 months’ history of severe and worsening dysmenorrhoea with cramps, which were insufficiently relieved by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, oral narcotics and the combined oral contraceptive pill. The worst pain occurred on the first day of her menses. In addition, she also complained of non-cyclical left-sided pelvic pain. She went through the menarche when she was 13 years old.
Pelvic examination revealed a normal vagina, vulva and adnexae and a normal-sized anteverted uterus containing a 2-cm firm fundal mass.
Hysteroscopy and operative laparoscopy were performed on day 12 of her menstrual cycle under general anaesthesia. Laparoscopy was carried out via direct entry. A 10-mm Excel Optiview® port was introduced intra-umbilically and a further three 5-mm lateral ports were placed under vision, one on the left side and two on the right with 6-cm distance in between. The lower ports were placed 1 cm medial to the anterior iliac spines. Operative findings included an arcurate uterus with clearly visible ostia and bilaterally patent fallopian tubes, thus ruling out a non-communicating uterine horn. A 20-mm nodular lesion with an external appearance similar to that of a fibroid (Fig. 1b) was embedded in the uterine myometrium and located in the fundus towards the left side just caudally to the round ligament. The rest of the pelvis appeared entirely normal. After vasopressin (Abraxis, Schaumburg, IL, USA) at a dilution of 1 U in 50 ml of normal saline was injected superficially into the lesion, a Harmonic Ace® scalpel was used to incise the visceral peritoneum overlying the lesion and the adjacent parametrium transversely. During enucleation of the lesion, it was difficult to establish a clear plane and thus the tumour was divided and drained of brown fluid reminiscent of an ovarian endometrioma (Fig. 1c). There was no continuity with the pelvic cavity. Further, careful excision with the Harmonic scalpel was employed to remove the cyst and the surrounding fibrosis. Haemostasis was achieved with bipolar diathermy and the cavity was closed with a layer of deep intramural and parametrial intracorporeal continuous 2/0 PDS sutures on a CT1 needle and a superficial layer including the superficial muscularis and serosa using 3/0 PDS sutures (Fig. 1d). The bisected specimen was removed through the umbilical port. Surgery lasted 90 min and the operative blood loss was less than 20 ml.
Since the first case report of juvenile cystic adenomyosis in 1996 , several other cases have recently drawn attention to this rarely diagnosed condition. However, increased awareness of this condition and improved access to trans-vaginal ultrasound scanning, MRI and laparoscopy may lead to better recognition of juvenile cystic adenomyosis in the future. This case emphasises the importance of linking the clinical findings with repeated ultrasound imaging and to explore the pelvis laparoscopically. None of the preoperative investigations in isolation, including MRI, would have helped to reach a definitive diagnosis; moreover, one-off ultrasound imaging alone may have led to the misdiagnosis of ovarian endometrioma or intramural fibroid. In fact, diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a lesion that was identical in external appearance with a uterine fibroid, and without the ultrasound scan that had demonstrated a fluid level, it could have been labelled as a fibroid and would probably not have been removed at the time of surgery. In this context, it is important to remember that fibroids rarely cause dysmenorrhoea , thus a painful ‘fibroid’ may reveal itself as an adenomyoma only during the operation or on histological examination.
It is important to state that this young woman was not operated on, on the basis of a radiological image, but after 18 months of incapacitating pain, unresponsive to medication. This pain is similar to pain caused by cryptomenorrhoea associated with a non-communicating uterine horn. Postoperatively, the patient is completely pain free and successfully pursuing her career. This patient derived optimal benefit from surgery, which she would not have had from medical treatment.
It can be tempting to label dysmenorrhoea in adolescents as ‘functional’ and commence medical treatment. However, apart from a single patient, who responded well to combined oral contraceptives , all patients, including the present, responded poorly to medical treatment such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication or gonadotropin-releasing-hormone analogues. In juvenile cystic adenomyosis, pelvic examination may be unremarkable, and thus lack of response to medical treatment should trigger further investigations, including ultrasound scanning, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy.
In contrast to the present patient, who complained of secondary dysmenorrhoea, most investigators reported primary dysmenorrhoea. The present case illustrates that a pre-existing developmental cyst within the myometrium may require a period of repetitive bleeding in order to become symptomatic as evidenced by the histological examination revealing numerous haemosiderin-laden histiocytes.
It is of particular interest that the present patient was suffering from juvenile cystic adenomyosis in addition to having an arcuate uterus, supporting developmental aetiology of juvenile cystic adenomyosis.
If there is no response to medical treatment, the optimal treatment for juvenile cystic adenomyosis appears to be resection. The laparoscopic route is preferable to laparotomy, if technically feasible, in order to avoid a negative impact on future fertility through adhesions.
In conclusion, this case draws attention to a little known but not uncommon cause for both primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea, which can affect young nulliparous women and should be included in the differential diagnosis of dysmenorrhoea in young women, which have been reviewed by Drosdzol et al. . It is best investigated with ultrasound scanning and MRI and can be treated laparoscopically with the same approach as used for myomectomy.
Dr Ball’s Fellowship in minimal access surgery was supported by the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, UK and the Endometriosis Millennium Fund, UK.
The authors would like to thank Mr Jeremy Carver for preparation of the illustrations.
Conflict of interest
There is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
- Maccarty WC, Blackman RH (1919) The frequency of adenomyoma of the uterus. Ann Surg 69(2):135–137PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamura M et al (1996) Juvenile adenomyotic cyst of the corpus uteri with dysmenorrhea. Tohoku J Exp Med 178(3):339–344View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nabeshima H et al (2003) Total laparoscopic surgery of cystic adenomyoma under hydroultrasonographic monitoring. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10(2):195–199View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryo E et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for cystic adenomyosis: a case report. J Reprod Med 51(5):427–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fisseha S et al (2006) Cystic myometrial lesion in the uterus of an adolescent girl. Fertil Steril 86(3):716–718View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeda A et al (2007) Laparoscopic management of juvenile cystic adenomyoma of the uterus: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(3):370–374View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamio M et al (2007) Isolated adenomyotic cyst associated with severe dysmenorrhea. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33(3):388–391View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho ML et al (2008) Adenomyotic cyst of the uterus in an adolescent. Pediatr Radiol 38(11):1239–1242View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dogan E et al (2008) Juvenile cystic adenomyosis mimicking uterine malformation: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(6):593–595View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Troiano RN, Flynn SD, McCarthy S (1998) Cystic adenomyosis of the uterus: MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(6):1198–1202View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lippman SA et al (2003) Uterine fibroids and gynecologic pain symptoms in a population-based study. Fertil Steril 80(6):1488–1494View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V (2008) Dysmenorrhea in pediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Ginekol Pol 79(7):499–503PubMedGoogle Scholar