Table 2 Demography of patients who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy (LTH) or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH)
From: A critical review of laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
Type of procedure | Age (years) | Parity | BMI | Uterine weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harmanli et al. 2009 [11] | LASH | 43.8 ± 5.9 | 1.85 ± 1.2 | 28.5 ± 6.9 | 190.4 ± 170 |
LTH | 44.6 ± 7.9 | 1.92 ± 1.3 | 27.9 ± 6.6 | 218.7 ± 196.2 | |
P value | NS | NS | NS | 0.007 | |
Mueller et al. 2009 [12] | LASH | 46.7 ± 7.0 | NA | 25.3 ± 5.1 | 286.2 ± 209.3 |
LTH | 46.3 ± 7.5 | 25.4 ± 4.0 | 264.8 ± 133.6 | ||
P value | NS | NS | NS | ||
Van Evert et al. 2010 [16] | LASH | 44 (28–60) | NA | NA | NA |
LTH | 49 (30–81) | ||||
Mousa et al. 2009 [13] | LASH | 45.7 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 26.6 ± 0.4 | 181 ± 12.0 |
LTH | 45.9 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 26.8 ± 1.5 | 161 ± 11.6 | |
P value | NA | NA | NA | NS | |
Cipullo et al. 2009 [14] | LASH | 49.5 ± 7.4 | NA | 27.6 ± 3.5 | 162.7 ± 112.7 |
LTH | 50.2 ± 7.8 | 27.6 ± 4.4 | 169.7 ± 116.6 | ||
P value | NS | NS | NS | ||
Kafy et al. 2009 [17] | LASH | 46.1 ± 7.0 | NA | NA | NA |
LTH | 46.6 ± 5.3 | ||||
P value | NA | ||||
Nam et al. 2008 [18] | LASH | 41.9 ± 4.7 | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 22.5 ± 2.4 | NA |
LTH | 46.3 ± 3.7 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 22.8 ± 3.2 | ||
P value | NS | NS | NS |