Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of literature: comparative studies of robotic assisted hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: population characteristics, operative time, and lymph nodes count

From: Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology

Authors

Year of publication

Method

Methodology

N

Mean age

Mean BMI

Mean operative time (min)

Lymph nodes

Sert [13]

2007

TLH/TRH

CC

7/8

45/41

22.5/24.6

300/241 (NS)

15/13 (NS)

Ko [14]

2008

TAH/TRH

HC

32/16

41.7/42.3

26.6/27.6

219/290 (S)

17.1/15.6 (NS)

Nezhat [15]

2008

TLH/TRH

PSOC

30/13

46.8/54.8

318/323 (NS)

31/25 (NS)

Fanning [16]

2008

TRH

RS

20

44

390

18

Kim [17]

2008

TRH

RS

10

49.9

207

27.6

Boggess [18]

2008

TAH/TRH

PSOC

49/51

41.9/47.4 (S)

26.1/28.6 (NS)

248/211 (S)

23.3/33.8 (S)

Magrina [19]

2008

TAH/TLH/TRH

CC

35/31/27

50.9/54.9/50

27.3/26.8/27.2

166/220/189 (S)

27.7/25.9/25.9 (NS)

Maggioni [20]

2009

TAH/TRH

CC

40/40

49.8/44.1 (S)

23.6/24.1 (NS)

200/272 (S)

26.2/20.4 (NS)

Oleszczuk [21]

2009

VRARHa

PS

12

44

24

356

40

Lowe [12]

2009

MI TRHb

PS

42

41

25.1

215

25

  1. TAH Total abdominal radical hysterectomy, TLH total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, TRH total robot-assisted radical hysterectomy, S significant difference or NS no significant difference
  2. aVaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy
  3. bMulti-institutional total radical robot assisted hysterectomy