- Techniques and instrumentation
- Open Access
Ultrasound-guided wired localisation for resection of impalpable anterior abdominal wall scar endometriomas
© Springer-Verlag 2011
- Received: 24 February 2011
- Accepted: 4 April 2011
- Published: 13 May 2011
The identification and subsequent complete excision of abdominal scar endometriosis is particularly challenging due to the difficulty in defining the endometriotic deposit from the surrounding scar tissue. This case demonstrates a technique to precisely identify the lesion using ultrasound, and by the use of wire localisation, guide the surgeon to the disease location. This allowed precise and complete wide local incision of the lesion.
- Caearean section
Abdominal wall scar endometriosis is defined as endometrial tissue deposited in abdominal surgical scar which is superficial to peritoneum [1, 2]. It represents between 0.03% and 3.5%  of all endometriosis. This is significant when parietal, appendiceal, pleuropulmonary and diaphragmatic endometriosis represent 5% of endometriosis cases .
Post-Caesarean section endometriosis represents 57%  of all abdominal scar endometriosis with an overall incidence between 0.03% and 0.47% [3, 5, 6]. Scar endometriosis can also occur after hysterectomies, laparotomy and even laparoscopy for ovarian cystectomy or appendectomy [7, 8].
Diagnosing abdominal wall scar endometriosis can be difficult. Only 47.5–70% of all diagnosis is correct pre-operatively [5, 9]. Symptoms include a mass in abdomen in up to 96% , abdominal pain in 87% , and pain which can be cyclical in 40%  or non-cyclical in 45% . Other differential diagnoses include incisional hernias, late abscesses or suture granulomas .
Radiological techniques including power doppler, ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging can all assist diagnosing and identify the extent of the lesion [10, 11]. The definitive diagnosis, however, remains through histology which can be obtained by either after resection or via ultrasound-guided biopsy .
The management of choice is wide local excision of lesion, with recurrence only occurring in between 4.3% and 9.1% of cases [1, 9]. This surgery however can be complex as the lesion is, by definition, embedded within scar tissue, and thus clear identification of the lesion within this abnormal tissue can be difficult. As such, lesions may be missed or incompletely excised making recurrent surgery necessary
The case below demonstrates a simple technique to exactly mark the location of the lesions prior to surgery, thereby optimising the surgical procedure.
A 31-year-old obese (BMI 43) patient presented with a history of pain in the suprapubic area just above and to the left of a previous Caesarean scar. This worsened on a cylical basis and was exacerbated by exercise and on sitting from a lying position. She had history of endometriosis and had previously undergone surgery to excise endometriosis form this incision around 7 years earlier. Examination revealed tethering over the area but no mass was palpable. Subsequently, she had chronic abdominal pain in the same area causing significant discomfort for many years. Her pain mainly involved the suprapubic area just above and to the left in relation to her previous Caesarean scar. This was worst whenever she does any exercise and when she is trying to sit up from lying. She does also note her pain worsens during her cycle. However on examination, no mass was palpable.
Steroid injections to the scar had been ineffective. The progesterone pill provided some improvement in pain, however, this was not complete and the symptoms increased on cessation.
In view of the previous surgery to excise this lesion and the difficulty in locating these lesions, it was decided to use ultrasound imaging to mark the lesion prior to surgery.
The patient was subsequently transferred to the operating theatre. After routine aseptic preparation, a 6 cm incision was made through the low transverse scar. The subcutaneous fat, anterior rectus sheath and associated scar tissue was divided down to the tip of the guide wire. At this point, the endometrial tissue began leaking haemoserous fluid. Knowing the dimensions of the lesion, the appropriate margining laterally and inferiorly were defined and this was confirmed by the cessation of haemoserous leakage. The lesions were fully excised by cutting diathermy and the resultant defect in the rectus sheath was closed with continuous 1.0 vicryl (polyglaction 910) suture. A suction drain was cited in the superficial layer and the superficial fat/scar tissue was opposed using 2.0 Vicryl (polyglaction 910). The skin incision closed with 2.0 vicryl rapide (polyglaction 910).
The following day, the suction drain was removed and patient discharged. Histology confirmed endometriosis with clear margins.
The patient was reviewed 3 and 7 months post-operatively, patient was completely pain free with no residual symptoms.
Ultrasound-guided guide wire localisation and resection of superficial impalpable masses is a well-established technique in surgery. Breast surgeons have been performing wire localisation and subsequent lumpectomy for breast cancers for years  and ear, nose and throat surgeons use such techniques for removal of impalpable deep lower cervical lymph nodes .
With the increasing rate of Caesarean section along and the increasing body mass index of the population, such lesion will become increasingly common and difficult to locate. This is particularly true of small, sometimes multiple lesions. This technique is simple and effective, utilising skills already available in most hospitals. With accurate, complete excision symptomatic improvement is highly likely and the need for subsequent surgery is minimised.
The authors are aware that longer follow-ups and further cases will be required to establish the efficacy of this treatment and eliminate the possible placebo effect of surgery. However, it is well-established that surgery improves symptoms in 80% at 6 months compared to 30% due to placebo effect surgery  and recurrence rate is low after complete excision.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Conflict of interest
There is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
- Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Esquivel-Estrada V, Briones-Garduno JC, Mondragon-Ballesteros R (2004) Endometriosis implant in Caesarean section surgical scar. Cir Cir 72(2):113–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leite GK, Carvalho LF, Korkes H, Guazzelli TF, Kenj G, Viana Ade T (2009) Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of literature. São Paulo Med J 127(5):270–277PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nisolle M, Pasleau F, Foidart JM (2007) L’endométriose extra-génitale. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod Paris 36(2):173–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Chen YH, Kay N (2009) Abdominal wall endometriomas. J Reprod Med 54(3):155–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minaglia S, Mishell DR Jr, Ballard CA (2007) Incisional endometriomas after Caesarean section: a case series. J Reprod Med 52(7):630–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akbulut S, Sevinc MM, Bakir S, Cakabay B, Sezgin A (2010) Scar endometriosis in the abdominal wall: a predictable condition for experienced surgeons. Acta Chir Belg 110(3):303–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Z, Al-Beiti MA, Tang L, Liu X, Lu X (2008) Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(7):742–745PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bektas H, Bilsel Y, San YS, Ersoz F, Koc O, Deniz M, Boran B, Huq GE (2010) Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of literature. J Surg Res 164(1):e77–81PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villalta J, Custardoy AL, Carrasquer JA, Pujala M, Gambo P (2006) Endometriosis in a laparotomic scar after Caesarean section: report of two cases. Cir Eso 79(5):313–315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pados G, Tympanidis J, Zafrakas M, Athanatos D, Bontis JN (2008) Ultrasound and MR-imaging in the preoperative evaluation of two rare cases of scar endometriosis. Cases J 18(1):97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koger KE, Shatney CH, Hodge K, McClenathan JH (1993) Surgical scar endometrioma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177(3):243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Athey PA, Diment DD (1989) The spectrum of sonographic findings in endometrioma. J Ultrasound Med 8:487–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francica G et al (2003) Abdominal wall endometriomas near cesarean delivery scars: sonographic and color Doppler findings in a series of 12 patients. J Ultrasound Med 22:1041–1047PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rissanen TJ, Makarainen HP, Kiviniemi HO, Suramo II (1994) Ultrasonographically guided wire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 13(3):183–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bryant JA, Siddiqu NJ, Loveday EJ, Irvine GH (2005) Presurgical, ultrasound-guided anchor-wire marking of impalpable cervical lymph nodes. J Laryngol Otol 119(8):627–628PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abbott J, Hawe J, Hunter D, Holmes M, Finn P, Garry R (2004) Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 82(4):878–884PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar