Skip to main content

Table 3 Functional results (graft surgery versus traditional surgery)

From: Use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a literature review

Trial

Number

Number of patients studied (graft surgery versus traditional surgery)

Results (graft surgery versus traditional surgery)

Nieminena 2008 [21]

202

182 (97 versus 85)

Score for vaginal bulge significantly lower in the mesh group 2 years after surgery

Scores for sexual function did not differ between the groups at baseline and 2 years after surgery

Score for dyspareunia significantly lower in the mesh group

Higher rate of patient reported their vagina to be too loose for intercourse in the mesh group

Guerettea 2009 [13]

94

1 year: 72 (35 versus 37)

Better UDI-6 score after surgery in both groups

Scores for sexual function did not differ between the groups at baseline and after surgery

2 years: 59 (26 versus 33)

Better rate of dyspareunia and PISQ-12 score after surgery in both groups

Hiltunen 2007 [6]

202

2 months: 201 (104 versus 97)

Majority of the symptoms resolved after surgery in both groups

Symptomatic recurrence higher in mesh group 12 months after surgery (4% versus 15%)

12 months: 200 (104 versus 96)

Stress urinary incontinence reported more frequently in the mesh group 12 months after surgery (23% versus 10%)

Nguyen 2008 [10]

76

75 (37 versus 38)

Better PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores after surgery in both groups

Lower POPDI-6 and UDI-6 scores, and higher CRADI-8 score in the mesh group

Sexual function, PISQ-12 score and rate of dyspareunia did not differ between the groups at baseline and after surgery

Sivasliolgu 2008 [11]

90

85 (43 versus 42)

Better P-QOL score after surgery in both groups

Carey 2009 [12]

139

124 (63 versus 61)

Worsening PSI-QOL, SUDI, SIIQ and CCCS scores after surgery in both groups

Rate of dyspareunia did not differ between the groups at baseline and after surgery

Lunardelli 2009 [14]

32

32 (16 versus 16)

Similar rate of de novo stress urinary incontinence between the groups after surgery (6.25%)

Ek 2010 [16]

50

47 (22 versus 25)

Higher rate of de novo stress urinary incontinence in mesh group after surgery (32% versus 8%)

Lower MUCP in mesh group after surgery in overweight women

Lower MUCP in mesh group after surgery in 65-years old or older patients

Iglesia 2010 [19]

65

65 (32 versus 33)

Better scores about symptoms, quality of life and dyspareunia after surgery in both groups

Nieminen 2010 [22]

202

182 (97 versus 85)

All symptoms of prolapse resolved after surgery in both groups

Sexual function did not differ between the groups at baseline and 2 years after surgery

Meschia 2007 [7]

206

201 (98 versus 103)

Improvement of symptoms of prolapse after surgery in both groups

Natale 2009 [15]

190

190 (96 Gynemesh® versus 94 Pelvicol®)

Improvement of quality of life after surgery in Gynemesh® group in the domains: prolapse impact, social limitations, emotions, and severity measures.

Improvement of quality of life after surgery in Pelvicol® group in all domains with the exclusion of physical limitations

Comparing the postoperative quality of life in both groups: better impact of Pelvicol® in the domains: social limitations and emotions

Better PISQ-12 score after surgery in Pelvicol® group

Comparing the postoperative sexuality in both groups: better impact of Pelvicol®

Feldner 2010 [17]

56

56 (29 versus 27)

Better P-QOL score after surgery in both groups

Hviid 2010 [18]

61

3 months: 50 (27 versus 23)

Better P-QOL score after surgery in both groups

12 months: 54 (28 versus 26)

De Tayrac 2008 [9]

49

45 (21 versus 24)

Lower pain and buttock pain in IVS® group the first day after surgery

No difference of “mean VAS” and “rate of patients with VAS > 5” in both groups after long term follow-up (4.8 versus 12.5%)

No difference of rate of patients “satisfy” and “very satisfy” in both groups after long term follow-up (85.7% versus 79.2%)

Better UDI, POPDI, CRADI, UIQ, CRAIQ and POPIQ score after surgery in both groups

Absence of improvement of PISQ-12 score after surgery in both groups

Paraiso 2006 [5]

106

81 (26 graft reinforcements versus 27 plication of the fascia versus 28 site-specific surgical repair)

Better PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores after surgery in all groups

Better quality of life after surgery in all groups

Better PISQ-12 scores after surgery in all groups

Absence of lower rate of dyspareunia after surgery in all groups

Lopes 2010 [20]

32

30 (14 versus 16)

Better quality of life (KHQ) 1 year after traditional surgery but without statistically significant difference

  1. PISQ-12 Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, UDI-6 Urogenital Distress Inventory Questionnaire, PFDI-20 Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form Questionnaire, PFIQ-7 Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire–Short Form Questionnaire, POPDI-6 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory Questionnaire, CRADI-8 Colorectal–Anal Distress Inventory Questionnaire, P-QOL Prolapse Quality Of Life Questionnaire, MUCP maximum urethral closure, KHQ King’s Health Questionnaire
  2. aIn these studies, functional results and sexuality are the main criteria