Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical publications and calculated effect size

From: Seprafilm® adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use

Reference

N

Therapeutic area

Favorable seprafilm outcome

Effect sizea

Reported p value

Becker et al. [3]

183

Abdominal

Incidence

17.4

<0.00000000001

Incidence of fewer dense adhesions

7.6

<0.0001

Incidence of fewer moderate adhesions

16.5

 

Incidence of greater mild adhesions

8.5

 

Extent

1.2

<0.001

Fukushima et al. [5]

30

Abdominal

Comparison to untreated control site

Incidence of adhesions

3.0

0.05

Incidence of more grade 1

3.3

0.05

Incidence of fewer grade 3

2.1

 

Comparison to pts with previous laparotomy

Incidence of adhesions

3.6

0.05

Incidence of more grade 1

9.0

0.01

Incidence of fewer grade 3

3.5

 

Salum et al. [14]

538

Abdominal

Incidence of intestinal obstruction

1.5

NS

Incidence of enterolysis

2.6

NS

Successful conservative management of bowel obstruction

1.1

NS

Vriland et al. [30]

71

Abdominal

Incidence of adhesions entire incision

Cannot be calculated—0 events in control group

0.48

Incidence of pelvic adhesions

3.0

0.41

Incidence of adhesions superior segment

2.1

0.48

Incidence of adhesions middle segment

8.0

0.09

Incidence of adhesions inferior segment

3.0

0.28

Median severity score entire incision

Cannot be calculated—only range reported

0.002

Tang et al. [27]

181

Abdominal

Overall mean 4 quadrant adhesion score Phase I

−0.06

NS

Overall mean 4 quadrant adhesion score Phase II

0.8

0.02

Kudo et al. [15]

51

Abdominal

Incidence of early postoperative bowel obstruction

Cannot be calculated—0 events in Seprafilm group

<0.05

Resumed liquid diet sooner

0.6

NS

Resumed solid diet sooner

0.5

NS

Mohri et al. [16]

367

Abdominal

Incidence of early postoperative small bowel obstruction

2.4

0.02

Reoperation for early postoperative small bowel obstruction

2.7

NS

Fazio et al. [8]

1791

Abdominal

Incidence of operative adhesive small bowel obstruction

1.9

0.044

Incidence of all cause bowel obstruction

1.0

NS

Salum et al. [28]

191

Abdominal

Incidence of grade 0 adhesions midline and stoma

4.3

0.021

Incidence of grade 0 adhesions midline

3.1

 

Incidence of greater grade 1 adhesions midline and stoma

2.0

0.096

Incidence of greater grade 1 adhesions midline

1.1

 

Incidence of fewer grade 3 adhesions midline and stoma

2.56

 

Incidence of fewer grade 3 adhesions midline

1.2

 

Incidence of enterotomy/myotomy midline and stoma

0.7

 

Incidence of enterotomy/myotomy midline

0.8

 

Fujii et al. [9]

115

Abdominal

Incidence of adhesion related post-op ileus

1.0

NS

27

Incidence of adhesions

11.6

0.0004

Van der Wal et al. [31]

35

Abdominal

Incidence of chronic abdominal complaints

4.7

0.018

Incidence of small bowel obstruction

Cannot be calculated—0 events in treatment group

NS

Oikonomokis et al. [35]

156

Abdominal Oncologic

Recurrence rate

1.8

NS

1 year survival

1.2

NS

2 year survival

2.3

NS

Kusonoki et al. [36]

62

Abdominal Oncologic

Incidence of intestinal obstruction prior to ileostomy closure

2.2

0.60

Incidence of intestinal obstruction following ileostomy closure

2.9

0.22

Incidence of grade 0 adhesions midline

40.6

 

Incidence of grade 0 adhesions stoma

Cannot be calculated—0 events in control group

 

5 year survival

1.6

 

Uchida et al. [32]

278

Abdominal Oncologic

No control group

n/a

n/a

Hayashi et al. [37]

144

Abdominal Oncologic

Incidence of small bowel obstruction

1.7

NS

Park et al. [38]

427

Abdominal

Incidence of early postoperative bowel obstruction

2.7

NS

Oncologic

Incidence of readmission for early postoperative bowel obstruction

1.7

NS

Khaitan et al. [20]

19

Abdominal laparoscopy

No control group

n/a

n/a

Shinohara et al. [23]

8

Abdominal laparoscopy

Feasibility study

n/a

n/a

Ortiz and Awad [25]

n/a

Abdominal laparoscopy

Feasibility study

n/a

n/a

Kawamura et al. [29]

36

Abdominal laparoscopy

Ileostomy take down time

Cannot be calculated

0.023

Seprafilm vs. no treatment

—no SD or SEM reported

Kawamura et al. [6]

282

Abdominal laparoscopy

Incidence of 2-year adhesive postoperative bowel obstruction

7.8

0.021

Klinger et al. [45]

1

Abdominal

Case report

n/a

n/a

Trickett et al. [46]

4

Abdominal

Case report

n/a

n/a

Remzi et al. [47]

3

Abdominal

Case report

n/a

n/a

David et al. [48]

1

Abdominal

Case report

n/a

n/a

Tyler et al. [49]

3

Abdominal

Case report

n/a

n/a

Mizuno et al. [39]

9

Pediatrics abdominal

No control group

n/a

n/a

Ong et al. [40]

3

Pediatrics abdominal

No control group

n/a

n/a

Inoue et al. [41]

122

Pediatrics abdominal

Incidence of adhesions

6.7

0.007

Incidence of greater grade 1 adhesions

12.8

0.0009

Reoperative time

1.1

0.04

Blood loss ≥ 3 g/kg

Cannot be calculated

0.09

Blood loss < 3 g/kg

—no SD or SEM reported

 

Winfield et al. [42]

18

Pediatric abdominal

No control group

n/a

n/a

Fushiki et al. [43]

52

Obstetrics

Incidence of adhesions

11.5

0.001

Operative time to delivery

Cannot be calculated—only range reported

0.014

Operative time total

Cannot be calculated—only range reported

0.009

Blood loss

Cannot be calculated—only range reported

0.134

Severity of adhesions

Cannot be calculated—only range reported

0.001

Diamond et al. [4]

127

Gynecologic

Mean number of sites adherent to the uterus

0.8

<0.0001

Severity

0.5

<0.01

Extent

0.4

<0.01

Tsuji et al. [44]

63

Gynecologic

Incidence of uterine adhesions compared o no treatment control

20

0.0003

Incidence of uterine adhesions compared to Dextran 40

14.4

0.0004

Incidence of uterine adhesions compared to Beriplast

18

0.0005

Incidence of peritoneal adhesions compared to no treatment control

13.5

0.001

Incidence of peritoneal adhesions compared to Dextran 40

2.5

0.2557

Incidence of peritoneal adhesions compared to Beriplast

4.3

0.0818

Incidence of adnexal adhesions compared to no treatment control

72

<0.0001

Incidence of adnexal adhesions compared to Dextran 40

6.8

0.0098

Incidence of adnexal adhesions compared to Beriplast

1.2

0.855

AFS Score compared to no treatment control

1.5

<0.0001

AFS Score compared to Dextran 40

0.9

0.0223

AFS Score compared to Beriplast

0.3

0.8208

Takeuchi et al. [21]

114

Gynecologic laparoscopy

No control group

n/a

n/a

Chuang et al. [22]

127

Gynecologic laparoscopy

No control group

n/a

n/a

Fenton and Fanning [24]

15

Gynecologic laparoscopy

Feasibility study

n/a

n/a

Lipetskaia et al. [26]

171

Gynecologic laparoscopy

Feasibility study

n/a

n/a

Bristow et al. [33]

21

Gynecologic Oncologic

Mean pelvic adhesion score versus mean abdominal adhesion score (internal control)

1.9

0.002

Mean pelvic adhesion score versus mean pelvic adhesion score (historical control)

1.7

0.004

Bristow et al. [50]

n/a

Gynecologic Oncologic

No control group—cost effectiveness

n/a

n/a

Tan et al. [34]

202

Gynecologic Oncologic

5 year disease free survival

0.6

NS

5 year overall survival

0.6

30 day bowel obstruction

3.4

Leitao et al. [17]

423

Gynecologic Oncologic

Incidence of intraabdominal collections

0.3

0.0009

Tabata et al. [18]

371

Gynecologic Oncologic

Incidence of early postoperative small bowel obstruction

5.0

<0.05

Incidence of surgical site infection

2.0

NS

  1. aFor continuous outcomes, effect size is the (control group mean − the Seprafilm mean) divided by the pooled standard deviation for the 2 groups [ES = (M1 − M2)/pooled SD], and for binomial outcomes, effect size is the odds ratio or the ratio of the odds of a success for the Seprafilm group to the odds of a success for the control group [ES = (ad)/(bc)]