Tubal ectopic pregnancy on a patient with two previous consecutive laparoscopic tubal sterilisation techniques
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Received: 20 October 2012
Accepted: 31 December 2012
Published: 18 January 2013
The article discusses the challenges of laparoscopic management of failed sterilisation techniques, the difficulty of further laparoscopic tubal sterilisation techniques using diathermy and the limitations of future hysteroscopic sterilisation when the proximal tubal end is missing.
Seven months later, she had an unexpectedly positive pregnancy test after missing her period for more than a month. Although the patient was asymptomatic, she came to the early pregnancy unit for a transvaginal ultrasound scan which was strongly suggestive of right tubal ectopic pregnancy (4 cm “doughnut” like structure in the right adnexal area, demarkable from the ovary) and her serum beta HCG was 22,959 IU/l.
This case report may generate many questions about failed sterilisation techniques which need to be discussed, particularly about appropriate usage of dye test/or hysterosalpingography in cases of failed or complicated sterilisation, how important is the consenting for the procedure and how big role can play laparoscopic surgical experience. It is important to emphasise that this patient was under the care of gynaecologist with different level of experience in laparoscopic sterilisation techniques.
Failed sterilisation techniques have been already described in the literature . Some of these cases have been complicated with ectopic pregnancies; other cases needed termination of intrauterine pregnancy or rarely patient decided to keep the pregnancy. Patients can be in great discomfort clinically and psychologically and they need adequate support . However, this case report is in our best knowledge the first one that reports an ectopic tubal unruptured pregnancy after two consecutive sterilisation surgeries with two different techniques . Filshie sterilisation technique is the most popular in UK  and following the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines, the failure rate is approximately 1/200. In case of diathermy using bipolar energy for tubal sterilisation, the failure rate is difficult to estimate as there are no published data. In the past, monopolar diathermy on the tubes was used with both higher failure and intraoperative complications rates. In our best knowledge, there are no studies comparing Filshie clip application and bipolar diathermy and their sterilisation failure rates .
In our case, the patient needed a diagnostic laparoscopy due to her persistent pelvic pains and three migrated clips (curiously attached all together) were removed successfully. During the first laparoscopic sterilisation, two clips were applied on each tube; however, at the second laparoscopy 4 years later, the remaining proximal end of each tube was very short not allowing any further clip application.
Some will argue that intraoperative dye test should always be done after retrieval of migrated clips in order to obtain macroscopic evidence of tubal blockage and consequently to avoid any surgical interference with the proximal tubes. The potential risk of weak proximal tubal fibrosis in this case with future tubal recanalisation is impossible to evaluate with dye test or hysterosalpingography. A dye test, in these cases of extremely short proximal tubal ends, may not reveal unblocked tubes (as it was confirmed during the third laparoscopy of this patient). Due to the increased intrauterine pressure generated during the dye test, there is a risk of “flush” and partial or complete future desobstruction of the thin fibrotic plug that resulted from the previous migrated Filshie clip. For these reasons in this particular case, it was thought beneficial to diathermise the proximal tubes during the second laparoscopy as the proximal tubal ends were very short from both sides and far away from the tubal clip application point (intermediate part of the tube).
Others will argue that in case of bipolar diathermy the technique needs to secure adequate placement of the bipolar grasper on the surface and periphery of the tubal end. This coagulating consequence of diathermy is difficult to evaluate as the fibrotic effect will depend on the amount of energy applied and how long this was applied for, on the thickness of the proximal tube and also it will depend on the nature of the coagulated tissues and finally the endogenous potential of healing.
Laparoscopic stitching of the uterine cornual end is difficult because needs expertise to avoid uterine trauma and bleeding. The surgical laparoscopic experience and adequate laparoscopic equipment for such operative laparoscopy were not available for the second and third procedure. The consent of this patient did not include conversion to laparotomy for salpingectomy (proximal ends) but only conversion to laparotomy in case of laparoscopic entry technique complications.
With the third laparoscopy, the surgical challenge was first to treat successfully the unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy with prompt uncomplicated salpingectomies on both remaining distal tubes and secondary to deal with the even shorter cornual tubal ends (remainders) in order to avoid another failure.
A secondary electrocoagulation applied on a larger area at the tubal–cornual origin was performed with the plan to review the patient with a hysterosalpingography 2 months postoperatively in order to demonstrate obstruction. However, even if the hysterosalpingography can show an obstruction it is uncertain for how long this will be maintained and how to follow up the patient.
Hysteroscopic sterilisation is not possible as there is no proximal tubal end long enough to secure permanent and uncomplicated insert placement. Hysteroscopic usage of intrafallopian “glue” for obstruction is not yet available. Further extensive laparoscopic excisions of the uterine cornual ends cannot guarantee complete obstruction either.
The future management options were discussed with the patient in the postroperative follow up and she opted for MIRENA IUS® rather other long-term contraceptive method or further surgery with laparotomy (cornual excision or hysterectomy).
Some questions and uncertainties could be highlighted with this case report. We do not know what could be the physiological healing history of the remaining proximal tube in case of migrated Filshie clips and so whether a recanalisation is a rare but unavoidable risk or whether there is an increased likelihood of recanalisation after usage of diathermy. It could be assumed that all would depend on the length and consistency of the fibrosis which is maintained at the most distal part of the proximal remaining tube. Most of surgeons use currently only one Filshie clip adequately applied on each tube. However in our case, two clips were applied and the ischemia and scar formation could be different than with 1 clip application. In our case, also all four clips migrated. Perhaps the usage of two clips on each tube might have created more tubal ischemia and hence higher risk of clip migration in long term. The ischemic tissue might become weaker in time and clips might not maintain in the appropriate position on the tubal isthmus.
In conclusion, most of the published reports refer to medico-legal aspect  of the cases with failed sterilisation techniques, especially those that occurred after a short period of time post operatively. Adequate laparoscopic technique and placement of Filshie clips minimise the risk of migration and possible recanalisation of the proximal tubal ends. There is little evidence to describe the risks of failed sterilisation and its correlation with migration of clips in the long term. In case of secondary laparoscopic correction of failed sterilisation, adequate consent needs to be done. Such consent should include the discussion about limits of preoperative and postoperative imaging techniques to confirm long term tubal obstruction, usage of long-term contraception methods and in case that the laparoscopic approach can not secure tubal blockage, to complete the bilateral salpingectomy (proximal–distal ends) with laparotomy.
- Awonuga AO, Imudia AN, Shavell VI, Berman J, Diamond MP, Puscheck EE (2009) Failed female sterilization: a review of pathogenesis and subsequent contraceptive options. J Reprod Med 54(9):541–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varma R, Gupta JK (2007) Predicting negligence in female sterilization failure using time interval to sterilization failure: analysis of 131 cases. Hum Reprod 22(9):2437–2443PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruminjo JK, Chabari C (1993) Twice-failed tubal ligation: a case report. East Afr Med J 70(8):528–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penfield AJ (2000) The Filshie clip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(3):485–489PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawrie TA, Nardin JM, Kulier R, Boulvain M (2011) Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilization. Cochrane Data Systematic Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858