From: The ESHRE–ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
I. Is there a need for a new classification system? | ||||
Strongly agree | Agree | Indifferent | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
42/89 (47.2 %) | 35/89 (39.3 %) | 8/89 (9 %) | 4/89 (4.5 %) | 0 % |
Agreement: 86.5 %, | 9 % | Disagreement: 4.5 % | ||
Rate of agreement: 82 % | ||||
II. Select the three most important characteristics that should be taken into account in the development of a new system | ||||
Characteristic | Ranking | Selected as one of the three | ||
Clear and accurate | 1st | 72.1 % | ||
Comprehensive | 36.8 % | |||
Correlated with patient’s clinical presentation | 39.7 % | |||
Correlated with patient’s management | 2nd | 66.2 % | ||
Simple and friendly | 3rd | 64.7 % | ||
Smooth movement from the old to the new one | 20.6 % | |||
III. Which of the following statements should be taken into account in the development of a new system | ||||
1. Anatomy should be the basic characteristic for patients’ grouping | ||||
Strongly agree | Agree | Indifferent | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
51/89 (57.3 %) | 33/89 (37.1 %) | 5/89 (5.6 %) | 0 % | 0 % |
Agreement: 94,4 %, | 5.6 % | Disagreement: 0 % | ||
Rate of agreement: 94.4 % | ||||
2. There is a “key” organ of the female genital tract that should be used in priority for the development of a new system | ||||
Strongly agree | Agree | Indifferent | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
25/89 (28.1 %) | 30/89 (33.7 %) | 24/89 (27.0 %) | 9/89 (10.1 %) | 1/89 (1.1 %) |
Agreement: 61,8 %, | 27.0 % | Disagreement: 11.2 % | ||
In case of agreement, indicate: | Uterus | |||
Rate of agreement: 50.6 % | ||||
3. Embryological origin should be the basic characteristic for patients’ grouping | ||||
Strongly agree | Agree | Indifferent | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
12/89 (13.5 %) | 13/89 (14.6 %) | 42/89 (47.2 %) | 20/89 (22.5 %) | 2/89 (2.2 %) |
Agreement: 28,1 %, | 47.2 % | Disagreement: 24.7 % | ||
Rate of agreement: 3.4 % | ||||
4. Embryological origin should be used, if feasible, as a secondary characteristic for patients’ grouping | ||||
Strongly agree | Agree | Indifferent | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
13/89 (14.6 %) | 50/89 (56.2 %) | 18/89 (20.2 %) | 7/89 (7.9 %) | 1/89 (1.1 %) |
Agreement: 70.8 %, | 20.2 % | Disagreement: 9.0 % | ||
Rate of agreement: 61.8 % | ||||
IV. Comments (feel free to make additional comments) |