Skip to main content

Table 3 Structured questionnaire for the second round of the DELPHI procedure; the participants have been asked to adapt their responses taking into account the answers of the first round and the new proposal

From: The ESHRE–ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies

I. This new classification system fulfill my needs and expectations

Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

22/71 (31.0 %)

40/71 (56.3 %)

7/71 (9.9 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

Agreement: 87.3 %

9.9 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 84.5 %

II. Please points out how far the following characteristics are addressed by the new classification.

1. It is clear and accurate (in definitions)

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 37/71 (52.1 %)

31 /71 (43.7 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 95.8 %

2.8 %

Disagreement: 1.4 %

Rate of agreement: 94.4 %

2. It is comprehensive

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 29/71 (40.8 %)

38/71 (53.6 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 94.4 %

2.8 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 91.6 %

3. It is correlated with patients clinical presentation

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 26/71 (36.6 %)

39/71 (55 %)

4/71 (5.6 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 91.6 %

5.6 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 88.8 %

4. It is correlated with patients management

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 25/71 (35.2 %)

38/71 (53.5 %)

7/71 (9.9 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 88.7 %

9.9 %

Disagreement: 1.4 %

Rate of agreement: 87.3 %

5. It is simple and users friendly

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 32/71 (45.1 %)

27/71 (38.0 %)

10/71 (14.1 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 83.1 %

14.1 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 80.3 %

6. There is a smooth movement from the old proposals to the this new one

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 16/71 (22.5 %)

38/71 (53.5 %)

13/71 (18.4 %)

4/71 (5.6 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 76,0 %

18.4 %

Disagreement: 5.6 %

Rate of agreement: 70.4 %

III. Which of the following statements are accomplished by the new system

1. Anatomy is used correctly as the basic characteristic for patientsgrouping

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 35/71 (49.3 %)

36/71 (50.7 %)

0 %

0 %

0 %

 Agreement: 100.0 %,

0 %

Disagreement: 0 %

Rate of agreement: 100 %

2. Uterus as the “key” organ of the female genital tract is used correctly in priority for the development of a new system

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 39/71 (55.0 %)

29/71 (40.8 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

 Agreement: 95.8 %

1.4 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 93 %

3. Embryological origin is not used, correctly, as the basic characteristic for patientsgrouping

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 18/71 (25.4 %)

33/71 (46.5 %)

17/71 (23.9 %)

3/71 (4.2 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 71.9 %

23.9 %

Disagreement: 4.2 %

Rate of agreement: 67.7 %

4. Embryological origin is used successfully as a secondary characteristic for patientsgrouping

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 12/71 (16.9 %)

42/71 (59.2 %)

14/71 (19.7 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

 Agreement: 76.1 %

19.7 %

Disagreement: 4.2 %

Rate of agreement: 71.9 %

5. Uterine anomalies are classified successfully in the proposed V classes

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 23/71 (32.3 %)

39/71 (55.0 %)

7/71 (9.9 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

 Agreement: 87.3 %

9.9 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 84.5 %

6. The classification of fusion defects in one class (Dysfused uterus/Class III) instead of two in the AFS classification (Didelphys and Bicornuate uterus) system is more functional and helps in creating a more accurate and clear in definition category

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 21/71 (29.5 %)

33/71 (46.5 %)

9/71 (12.7 %)

8/71 (11.3 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 76.0 %

12.7 %

Disagreement: 11.3 %

Rate of agreement: 64.7 %

7. The addition of normal uterus as Class 0 gives the opportunity to effectively classify cervical and/or vaginal only anomalies and, thus, obstructive anomalies

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 36/71 (50.7 %)

26/71 (36.6 %)

6/71 (8.5 %)

3/71 (4.2 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 87.3 %

8.5 %

Disagreement: 4.2 %

Rate of agreement: 83.1 %

8. The independent classification of cervical and vaginal anomalies gives the opportunity to clearly classify the females genital tract anomalies

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 32/71 (45.1 %)

36/71 (50.7 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

1/71 (1.4 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 95.8 %

2.8 %

Disagreement: 1.4 %

Rate of agreement: 94.4 %

9. Cervical and vaginal anomalies are classified successfully in the proposed 4 classes

 Strongly agree

Agree

Indifferent

Disagree

Strongly disagree

 20/71 (28.1 %)

41/71 (57.8 %)

8/71 (11.3 %)

2/71 (2.8 %)

0 %

 Agreement: 85.9 %

11.3 %

Disagreement: 2.8 %

Rate of agreement: 83.1 %

IVa. Could you please report a case that, according to you, could not be effectively classified by this new system?

IVb. Comments (feel free to make additional comments); please notice that it is important

  1. The scale of answers includes five degrees to rank the agreement in each scientific issue; the extent of agreement between the participants is shown in percentages