Skip to main content

Table 5 Diagnostic accuracy of 3D US compared with hysteroscopy ± laparoscopy in diagnosing female genital tract congenital anomalies

From: The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies

Study

Cases (n)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Accuracy (%)

Imboden et al. [31]

10

100

100

100

100

100

Laganà et al. [35]

224

100

100

100

100

100

Ludwin et al. [38]

117

97

100

100

80

94

Moini et al. [42]

214

87

97

99

54

84

Bocca et al. [6]a

125

100

100

100

100

100

Faivre et al. [18]

31

100

100

100

100

100

Ghi et al. [22]

284

100

100

100

100

100

Makris et al. [39]

248

100

100

100

100

100

Momtaz et al. [44]

38

97

96

92

99

96

Radoncic and Funduk-Kurjak [49]

267

100

100

100

100

100

Wu et al. [61]

40

100

100

100

100

100

Mean (95 % CI)

 

98.3 (95.6–100)

99.4 (98.4–100)

99.2 (97.6–100)

93.9 (84.2–100)

97.6 (94.3–100)

  1. 3D US three-dimensional ultrasound, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence interval
  2. aPerformed in conjunction with saline infusion