Table 6 Diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared with hysteroscopy ± laparoscopy in diagnosing female genital tract congenital anomalies
From: The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies
Study | Cases (n) | Correct sub-classification (n; %) |
|---|---|---|
Imboden et al. [31] | 13 | 7/13 (54 %) |
Faivre et al. [18] | 31 | 24/31 (77 %) |
Santos et al. [53] | 26 | 23/26 (89 %) |
Mueller et al. [45] | 105 | 83/105 (81 %) |
Deutch et al. [15] | 7 | 2/7 (29 %) |
Marten et al. [40] | 4 | 4/4 (100 %) |
Console et al. [13] | 22 | 21/22 (95 %) |
Minto et al. [41] | 9 | 7/9 (78 %) |
Letterie et al. [36] | 16 | 12/16 (75 %) |
Pellerito et al. [47] | 24 | 24/24 (100 %) |
Carrington et al. [10] | 29 | 29/29 (100 %) |
Fedele et al. [19] | 18 | 18/18 (100 %) |
Weighted mean | 254/296 (85.8 %) |