Table 1 Univariable analysis of risk factors for re-intervention
From: Incidence and predictors of failed second-generation endometrial ablation
Variable | Re-intervention (%) | No Re-intervention (%) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
Total patients | 927 (15.6) | 5009 (84.4) | |
Age (years) | |||
Mean | 41.59 | 42.94 | < .001 |
Age band < 35 | 90 (9.7) | 388 (7.8) | |
35–40 | 223 (24.1) | 908 (18.1) | |
40–45 | 324 (35.0) | 1647 (32.9) | |
45–50 | 233 (25.1) | 1516 (30.3) | |
> 50 | 57 (6.2) | 550 (11.0) | |
Race | |||
Asian | 3 (0.3) | 35 (0.7) | < .001 |
Black | 202 (21.8) | 809 (16.2) | |
White | 685 (73.9) | 4020 (80.3) | |
Other | 37 (4.0) | 145 (2.9) | |
Weight (kg) | 80.84 | 80.71 | .60 |
Height (cm) | 163.70 | 164.33 | .07 |
BMI (kg/m2) | |||
Mean | 30.17 | 29.89 | .75 |
< 18 | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
18–25 | 95 (10.3) | 830 (89.7) | |
25–30 | 113 (11.8) | 845 (88.2) | |
30–35 | 90 (13.9) | 556 (86.1) | |
35–40 | 46 (10.9) | 375 (89.1) | |
> 40 | 35 (11.2) | 279 (88.9) | |
Ablation technique | |||
Uterine balloon | 47 (14.2) | 284 (85.8) | |
Hydrothermablation | 349 (18.9) | 1499 (81.1) | |
Radiofrequency | 531 (14.1) | 3226 (85.9) | < .001 |