Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics and outcomes of the included studies evaluating the effect of the medical treatment for endometriosis on QoL

From: Medical and surgical interventions to improve the quality of life for endometriosis patients: a systematic review

First author and study period

Type of study

Sample size

Range of age

Type of medical treatment

Type of endometriosis treated

Results

Instruments

Ács et al. 2015 [50]

Multicenter randomized controlled study

180

n = 45 Oral elagolix 150 mg once daily

n = 45 Elagolix 250 mg

n = 45 placebo

n = 45 LA 1-month depot 3.75 mg intramuscularly

18-45

GnRH antagonist: Elagolix vs leuprorelin acetate (LA) and placebo

Not specified

There were improvements from baseline to week 12 in

all 5 dimensions of the EHP-5 in all treatment groups.

The differences between elagolix 150 mg, elagolix 250 mg vs. LA were statistically significant (p = 0.006 and p = 0.0204, respectively), which indicated a higher efficacy of LA in the pain dimension of EHP-5.

EHP-5

Agarwal et al. 2015 [47]

Randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial

20

n = 5 D + E2 transdermal

n = 7 D + E2 nasal

n = 8 D + E2 + T nasal

25-45

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) deslorelin (D) with low-dose estradiol ± testosterone (E2 ± T) add-back

Not specified

There were statistically significant improvements relative to baseline for five of the ten quality of life domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, and vitality; those that were unaffected by treatment were already within normative ranges for women of similar age at baseline. Quality of life issues with everyday problems was significantly improved with treatment.

SF-36

Caruso et al. 2015 [51]

Prospective study

92

18-37

Dienogest

Not specified

At 3 months follow-up, women reported QoL improvement in physical function, physical role, body pain, general health, social function and emotional role categories (p < 0.05); at 6 months follow-up, they reported improvement in all categories (p < 0.001).

SF-36

Caruso et al. 2015 [63]

Prospective study

56

18-31

Palmitoylethanolamine and α-lipocic acid

Not specified

No changes were observed in QoL at the 3rd month follow-up. By the 6th and 9th month all categories of the QoL (P < 0.001) improved.

SF-36

Caruso et al. 2016 [57]

Comparative, open-label prospective study

96

n = 63 Study group (continuous regimen)

n = 33 Control group (21/7 regimen)

18-35

2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol continuous vs 21/7 regimen oral contraceptive

Not specified

At 3 and 6 months, the Study group reported QoL improvements in all categories (p < 0.001). The Control group reported QoL improvements in all categories at the second follow-up (p < 0.05). The QoL of the Control group improved slightly at the second follow-up. The intergroup statistical comparison analysis between each follow-up showed a better efficacy of the continuous regimen than the 21/7 conventional regimen in all the QoL aspects.

SF-36

Carvalho et al. 2018 [62]

Randomized clinical trial

103

n = 52 ENG implant

n = 51 LNG-IUS

18-35

Etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant vs 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Not specified

Health-related quality of life improved significantly in all domains of the core and modular segments of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire, with no difference between both treatment groups.

EHP-30

Granese et al. 2015 [49]

Multi-center randomized trial

78

n = 39 Dienogest + E2V

n = 39 GnRH-a

18-45

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analog vs dienogest plus estradiol valerate after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis

Not specified

At the 9-month follow up, the questionnaire results showed a considerable increase of scores for all women compared with before surgery, demonstrating an improvement in the QoL and an equal health-related satisfaction with both treatments

EHP-5

Lee et al. 2016 [48]

Prospective, comparative study

64

n = 28 GnRHa + add back group

n = 36 Dienogest group

18-45

GnRHa plus add back therapy vs dienogest in the treatment of pain recurrences

after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis

Not specified

In this study, there are no differences in QOL according to treatment option.

WHOQOL-BREF

Leonardo-Pinto et al. 2017 [55]

Prospective cohort study

30

18-45

Dienogest

DIE (intestinal and posterior fornix)

Treatment with dienogest for 12 months positively affected several domains of QoL, with significant improvement in the physical, psychological, as well as a self-assessment of QoL and health.

WHOQOL-BREF

Luisi et al. 2015 [52]

Prospective observational multicenter cohort study

142

 

Dienogest

Not specified

Quality-of-life assessments in the present study showed improvements in both physical and mental indices within 12 weeks, also confirming the decrease of endometriosis-associated pain.

SF-12

Morotti et al. 2014 [58]

Prospective patient preference trial

144

n = 82 COC group

n = 62 Desogestrel group

 

COCs vs POPs in patients with migraine without aura

Symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis and migraine without aura

Regarding the quality of life, the baseline values of physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) were similar for both groups while after 6 months of treatment a statistical improvement was observed in both components in group POP (p < 0.001 for both PCS and MCS) compared to group COC (p = 0.154 and p = 0.640 for PCS and MCS respectively)

SF-36

Sansone et al. 2018 [61]

Multicenter prospective observational study

25

18-45

Etonogestrel implant

Ovarian endometrioma

After 12 months, the bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health domains of the QoL score were significantly improved.

SF-36

Seo Jong-Wook 2019 [56]

Prospective cohort study

52 women

n = 20 GnRHA+ COC

n = 32 Dienogest (28.1 5.9)

 

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus add-back therapy vs dienogest (DNG) treatment as medical treatments after surgery

Ovarian endometrioma

Physical, psychological, social, and environmental components of QOL were not significantly different across treatment options.

WHOQOL-BREF

Strowitzki et al. 2010 [53]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

188

n = 90 Placebo

n = 98 Dienogest

18-45

Dienogest at a dose of 2 mg daily for 12 weeks

Not specified

Quality-of-life analyses indicated greater improvements in the dienogest group for two of eight SF-36 categories: bodily pain and role emotional Mental sum scale and physical sum scale scores showed similar improvements in both groups.

SF-36

Strowitzki et al. 2010 [54]

Randomized, multicenter, open-label trial

186

n = 90 DNG group

n = 96 LA group

18-45

Dienogest vs leuprolide acetate for 24 weeks

Not specified

Compared with LA, DNG was associated with pronounced improvements in specific quality-of-life measures. In particular, DNG produced greater improvements in the categories “physical functioning,” “vitality,” and “social functioning.”

SF-36

Tanmahasamut et al. 2012 [59]

Double-blind randomized controlled trial

54

n = 28 Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

n = 26 Control group

 

Postoperative Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Not specified

The Short Form-36 scores improved in the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group but did not change in the expectant management group

SF-36

Yucel et al. 2018 [60]

Prospective, cross-sectional and non-comparative study

42

18-50

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Not specified

Regarding the SF-36 health questionnaire, the calculated physical health scores and the mental health scores increased by the end of 12 months.

SF-36

Zhao et al. 2012 [46]

Controlled, randomized, open-label study

100

n = 50 GnRHa +PMR

n = 50 Control group: only GnRHa therapy

18-48

Progressive muscle relaxation training on patients under GnRHa

Not specified

After 12 weeks of therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa), women with endometriosis experienced improvement in almost all QoL parameter. Between-group comparisons of the improvement in scores after intervention showed that the PMR group had significantly better improvement in the scores of anxiety, depression and overall/domain QOL than the control group (P < 0.05)

SF-36

  1. LA leuprorelin acetate, GnRHa gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists, D deslorelin, E2 estradiol, T testosterone, ENG etonogestrel, LNG-IUS levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, DIE deep infiltrating endometriosis, GnRHant gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists, E2V estradiol valerate, COCs combined oral contraceptives, POPs progestogen-only contraceptive pills, PCS physical component summary, MCS mental component summary, PMR progressive muscle relaxation training