Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: results of a 100-patient series with 8 years follow-up
© Springer-Verlag Berlin / Heidelberg 2004
Published: 25 February 2004
Assess the feasibility, safety and results at mean term of laparoscopic promontofixation, and to describe the operative technique.
Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Caen University Hospital, France.
One hundred patients included from June 1993 to June 2001.
Pre- and post-operative clinical assessment of pelvic statics problems in accordance with the international POP-Q classification. Annual follow-up of patients and recording of any adverse effects.
Main outcome measures
The number of per-operative, immediate and late post-operative complications, together with the number of cases of recurrent prolapse.
The mean follow-up was 43 months with one patient lost to follow-up. The rate of per operative complications was 11% (injuries: 6 bladder; 1 ureter; 1 vaginal; 1 rectal; 2 vascular) with a 4% rate of conversion to laparotomy. The rate of early post-operative complications was 9%, involving 7 patients (4 urinary infections, 3 occlusion syndromes, 1 eventration at a port site, 1 case of lumbo-sacral pain). The rate of late post operative complications was 25%, involving 24 patients (3 vaginal erosions, 2 volvulus of ileum, 5 cases of urinary stress incontinence, 14 cases of de novo constipation and 1 case of chronic pelvic pain). The success rate was 96% with 6 cases of partial recurrence (4 cystoceles and 2 rectoceles).
Laparoscopic promontofixation is feasible and safe. The rates of complications and recurrence are comparable to those reported in the literature for procedures carried out by laparotomy. The advantages connected with endoscopic surgery are the reduced trauma to the abdominal wall and the improved anatomical vision provided by the optic fibres; however, the long learning curve means that this procedure should be reserved for confirmed practitioners of laparoscopic surgery.
KeywordsProlapse Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy
Since the end of the 1950s two different standard methods for surgical management of genital prolapse have competed with each other: the vaginal approach for fascia repair, reinforcing the structures using autologous tissues; and the abdominal method, whether endoscopic or not, reinforcing the fascia and using prostheses for suspension. The surgical goals are simple and identical: to correct each element contributing to the prolapse and any associated urinary problems [1, 2], but the multiplicity of techniques available is in itself proof of how difficult the question is [3, 4, 5, 6]. In addition to differences between schools, the less aggressive vaginal method, despite its high rate of recurrence, was more indicated for elderly, less active patients who are more fragile with respect to anaesthesia and major surgery.
The abdominal route was used more for younger women in whom the use of a prosthesis was a guarantee that the repair would remain good for a longer period. The development of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has enabled the invasive nature of the operation to be reduced but requires a higher level of technical skill.
The purpose of this article is to report on 8 years of experience with laparoscopic promontofixation in order to assess the feasibility, safety and results.
Materials and methods
Staging of the prolapse according to the international POP-Q classification 
Stage: no. of patients
Stage: no. of patients
III C: 16
IV C: 9
III C: 46
IV C: 19
III Ba: 55
IV Ba: 11
III Bp: 49
IV Bp: 4
No. of patients
Conversion to laparotomy
Early post-operative complications
No. of patients
Early post-operative complications (%)
Urinary tract infection
Port site eventration
Late post-operative complications
Late post-operative complications (%)
Volvulus of the ileum
Urinary stress incontinence
De novo constipation
Concerning our results at the present time we have been confronted with no total recurrence of prolapse. Two patients suffered a recurrence of stage 3 Ba cystocele that appeared 2 and 4 months after surgery. Two other patients had a recurrence of cystocele, 2 Ba in the 1 case and 3 Ba in the other, 2 and 4 years after the operation. Two cases of recurrent rectocele occurred 2 and 3 years after promontofixation, both of which were stage-3 Bp. There were no cases of recurrent hysterocele nor prolapse of the vaginal vault. From the functional point of view, 2 de novo cases of stress urinary incontinence appeared 18 months and 2 years post-operatively. Three cases of urinary incontinence recurred after 1, 2 and 4 months. No dyspareunia, no perineal and no lumbo-sacral pain was recorded.
The characteristics of the population studied in our work are comparable to those described in the literature [12, 13, 18, 21, 22]. The mean age of our patients (55 years) is identical. Forty-five percent of our patients were past the menopause, which for certain authors is proof of good results since they find a connection between advancing age, the menopause and poor results [12, 23]. The mean weight of the patients gives rise to no particular comment. The per-operative complications encountered in the various series published, whether with laparoscopy or with laparotomy, are of the same types: they can be resumed as organ and vascular injuries .
Our per-operative rate of complications is practically the same (15%) as other laparoscopic series (5–12%) [18, 21, 22]. Bladder injury is the main complication, whether with laparoscopy or laparotomy, with a mean frequency of 5% . In our experience the 6 bladder injuries occurred in patients with a prior history of hysterectomy. Our rate of conversion to laparotomy (4%) is comparable to those in the other laparoscopic series: 3 for multiple adhesions in the true pelvis and the fourth for an anatomical variation (bifurcation of the vena cava too low). Our per-operative complications occurred with the same frequency from beginning to end of the series. Our operating time is considerably shorter, probably due to the use of clips to fix the prostheses and the choice not to carry out any hysterectomy.
Concerning the post-operative complications and notably those connected with the prostheses [4, 25]: major prolapse is comparable to hernia of the abdominal wall, which is a hernia due to a weakness that requires the use of prosthetic material [25, 26, 27] to reinforce the damaged connective tissue in the fascias. We had three complications of this type; the first was a fistula of the lower ureter which required uretero-vesical reimplantation via laparotomy without ablation of the prosthesis. No urinary fistula has been described in the literature with this technique to date. Our two other complications consisted of anterior vaginal erosions opposite the prosthesis, a complication which exists in the literature . Our percentage of erosion (2%) is perfectly in line with that described in the other series published [4, 11, 20, 29, 30, 31]. The appropriate treatment consists of exeresis of the fragment of mesh exposed by the erosion via the vagina, followed by vaginal suture after freshening the edges to be sutured, without any incidence on the anatomical or functional results. In all the series published these prostheses are fixed using non-resorbable suture material. The specific characteristic of our series lies in the fact that we fix the strips in position using Endohernia clips, which makes the procedure easier. We do not feel there is any greater risk of transfixing the vagina that with sutures.
The occlusion syndrome is a complication generally reported with a frequency of 1.5–3% depending on the series [11, 12, 30, 32]. Any abdominal operation runs this risk, and the existence in addition of a deep pelvic fossa crossed in the anterio-posterior direction by prosthetic material increases this risk. The occurrence of occlusion is connected in the great majority of cases with a defect in peritonisation. To help avoid this complication certain authors, such as Cosson et al.  and Lefranc and Blondon , recommend sub-total or even total hysterectomy in order to make peritonisation easier, for this is recognised as being difficult when the uterus remains in place [33, 34]. In our series, all the occlusion problems occurred in patients who had a prior history of hysterectomy, which thus contradicts this theory. We observed no case of spondylodiscitis in our study, despite the vaginal, bladder and rectal injuries. The same is true for the other laparoscopy series [35, 36]. The other complications reported in the literature for laparotomy are parietal sepsis and pulmonary embolism, which have not been mentioned with the laparoscopic route.
Study of the anatomical and functional results for laparoscopic prolapse repair is not very satisfactory as yet because of the variety of techniques depending on the surgeon, and the low number of patients covered by the reports published. There is no randomized study allowing any statement to the effect that the results of laparoscopic promontofixation might be comparable to those obtained by laparotomy. According to the literature, recurrence of prolapse after promontofixation most often takes the form of posterior colpocele. This could be explained by inadequate posterior dissection that leaves the rectoceles intact. Moreover, certain operators simply install a single anterior prosthesis without addressing the posterior aspect . Both cases of recurrence of rectocele in our series can probably be explained by inadequate dissection or by an early shift in position of the prosthesis, before collagen colonization. While the two delayed recurrences concerning the anterior vagina may be due to the same reason, the two early recurrences would appear to be more probably connected with incomplete dissection and repair resulting in persistence of the fascia lesion. From the functional point of view, notably urinary, we have a 3% rate of recurrence of stress urinary incontinence, which is in agreement with other published results (between 4 and 9%); however, our series is the only one using laparoscopy to have noted two cases of de novo stress urinary incontinence 18 months and 2 years later. These patients had a normal urodynamic pre-operative work-up and colposuspension was carried out as a routine.
From the sexual point of view, no dyspareunia has been reported in the laparoscopic series, and the same holds true for ours; however, depending on the series, 10–25% of patients complain of this after surgery by laparotomy [37, 38].
With respect to bowel function, a reproach made for promontofixation is that it results in post-operative constipation [33, 39]. Our results confirm this since de novo constipation represents 56% of late post-operative complications. The mechanism behind this constipation is similar to the dyschezia found after rectopexy and is difficult to analyse, but it is possible that apart from rectal denervation problems a certain rigidity in the fixing could also be involved.
Surgical correction of genital prolapse by promontofixation is the result of several decades of evolution in the technique. In view of the results of our series, compared with the literature, the use of laparoscopy to carry out promontofixation appears to present many advantages for treating prolapse in young women. The fact that at medium term laparoscopy gives comparable results to those obtained with laparotomy, but in less aggressive fashion, makes it very attractive. It is easier to reproduce in patients with no past history of pelvic surgery, since the cleavage planes are less difficult to find and dissect; however, the learning curve is relatively long and requires considerable experience in laparoscopy. Once it has been mastered, this technique also needs sufficient numbers of patients for pelvic statics surgery in order to maintain the required level of skill. The technique for correction of prolapse by laparoscopic promontofixation is still being assessed and is reserved for trained surgeons working in specialized teams, allowing the procedures to be carried out under optimum safety conditions. When this is so, it allows patients to be offered surgical treatment with no added complications.
We thank M. Dreyfus for his advice on methodology and for the production of this article.
- Hugier J, Scali P (1957) La suspension postérieure au disque lombo-sacré. Gynecol Obstet 56:94–98Google Scholar
- Kamina P, Chansigaud JP (1988) Soutènement et suspension des viscères pelviens chez la femme. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 17:835–848Google Scholar
- Angulo A, Kligman I (1989) Retroperitoneal sacrocolpopexy for correction of prolapse of vaginal vault. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169:319–323Google Scholar
- Blanc B, Franquebalme JP, Agher JP, Conte M, Grectas MJ, Ruf H (1985) Les prolapsus génitaux. A propos d’une série de 220 cas. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 80:713–721Google Scholar
- Constantin S, Iosif CS (1993) Abdominal sacral colpopexy with using of synthetic mesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 72:214–217Google Scholar
- Scali P, Blondon J, Gerard M (1974) Les opérations de soutènement-suspension par voie haute dans le traitement des prolapsus vaginaux. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 3:365–378Google Scholar
- Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17Google Scholar
- Theobald P von, Lucas J, Barjot P, Cheret A, Grosdemouge I, Herlicoviez M (1999) Faisabilité de la fronde sous uréthrale coelioscopique. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 28:529–533Google Scholar
- Theobald P von, Guillaumin D, Levy G (1995) Laparoscopic preperitoneal colposuspension for stress incontinence in women. Technique and results of 37 procedures. Surg Endosc 9:1189–1192Google Scholar
- Lefranc JP, Blondon J (1983) Chirurgie des prolapsus génitaux par voie abdominale. J Chir 120:431–436Google Scholar
- Ocelli B, Marducci F, Cosson M, Ego A (1999) La promontofixation par voie abdominale dans la cure des prolapsus génitaux féminins avec ou sans incontinence urinaire. A propos de 271 cas. Ann Chir 53:367–377Google Scholar
- Deval B, Fauconnier A, Repiquet D, Liou Y, Montuclard B (1997) Traitement chirurgical des prolapsus génito-urinaires par voie abdominale. A propos d’une série de 232 cas. Ann Chir 51:256–265Google Scholar
- Lecuru F, Taurelle R, Clouard C, Attal JP (1994) Traitement chirurgical des prolapsus génito-urinaires par voie abdominale. Résultats d’une série continue de 203 interventions. Ann Chir 48:1013–1019Google Scholar
- Snyder TE, Krantz KE (1991) Abdominal retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 77:944–949Google Scholar
- Valattis SR, Stanton SL (1994) A retrospective study of a clinician’s experience. Br J Obstet Gynecol 101:518–522Google Scholar
- Mage G, Wattiez A, Pomel C, Canis M, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (1996) Limites de la prise en charge coelioscopique des troubles de la statique pelvienne en gynécologie. Presse Med 25:2037–2041Google Scholar
- Smith ARB (1995) Laparoscopic surgery for incontinence and genito-urinary prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:397–399Google Scholar
- Wattiez A, Boughizane S, Alexandre F, Canis M, Mage G (1995) Laparoscopic procedures for stress incontinence and prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:317–321Google Scholar
- Cheret A, Theobald P von, Lucas J, Dreyfus M, Herlicoviez M (2001) Faisabilité de la promontofixation par voie coelioscopique. Série prospective de 44 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 30:139–143Google Scholar
- Cosson M, Bogaert E, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crepin G (2000) Promontofixation par coelioscopie: résultats à court terme et complications chez 88 patientes. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 29:746–750Google Scholar
- Mahendran D, Prasmar S, Smith ARB, Murphy O (1996) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse. Gynecol Endosc 5:217–222Google Scholar
- Nezhat C.H, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (1994) Laparoscopic sacralcolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 84:885–888Google Scholar
- Fantl JA, Cardozo L, McClich DK (1994) Estrogen therapy in the management of urinary incontinence in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis. First report of the hormones and urogenital therapy committee. Obstet Gynecol 83:12–18Google Scholar
- Sutton GP, Addisson WA, Livengood CH, Hammond CB (1981) Life threatening hemorrhage complications of sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:836–837Google Scholar
- Brown GL, Richardson D, Malangoni MA, Tobin GR, Ackerman D, Polk HC (1985) Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg 201:705–711Google Scholar
- Law NW, Ellis H (1988) Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mater 3:95–101Google Scholar
- Ridley JH (1976) A composite vaginal vault suspension using fascia lata. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:590–596Google Scholar
- Timmons MC, Addisson WA (1997) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Pelvic Surg 3:75–80Google Scholar
- Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coartes K, Low V, Bump RC, Addisson WA (1997) Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy. A new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1345–1355Google Scholar
- Dagorne JM, Lemoine JP, Duval CL, Villiere J (1987) Cure des prolapsus génitaux par voie abdominale et avec matériel prothétique. Analyse d’une série de 40 observations. Rev Fr Gynécol Obstét 82:151–155Google Scholar
- Volz J, Strittmatter E, Volz E, Koster S, Wischnik A, Melchert F (1993) Die pelviskopische Sakropexie zur Therapie des vaginal Prolapses. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 53:705–708Google Scholar
- Addison WA, Timmuns MC, Wall LL, Livengood CH (1984) Failed abdominal sacral colpopexy. Observations and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol 74:480–482Google Scholar
- Villet R, Morice P, Bech A (1993) Approche abdominale des rectocèles et des élytrocèles. Ann Chir 41:626–630Google Scholar
- Wetzel O, Katmeh S, Plougastel-Lucas ML, Bourdon J (1995) Traitement des prolapsus génito-urinaires par promontofixation à l’aide d’un matériel prothétique associé à une hystérectomie totale; complications et résultats à propos d’une série de 55 observations. Progrès Urol 5:221–230Google Scholar
- Cailleux N, Daragon A, Laine F, Deshayes P et al. (1991) Spondylodiscites infectieuses après cure de prolapsus génital. A propos de 5 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 20:1074–1078Google Scholar
- Seneze J (1991) A propos des spondylodiscites infectieuses après cure de prolapsus génital. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 20:448Google Scholar
- Fatton B, Grunberg P, Phana M, Mansoor A, Descamps C, Jacquetin B (1993) Cure de prolapus chez la femme jeune : la voie abdominale n’a pas d’avantage sur la voie vaginale. A propos d’une étude prospective randomisée. Résultats fonctionnels et évaluation de la qualité de vie. J Obgyn 1:133–43Google Scholar
- Graig GA, Jackson P (1975) Letter: sexual life after vaginal hysterectomy. Br Med J 3:97Google Scholar
- Dolk A, Broden G, Holmstrom B, Johansson C, Nilsson BY (1990) Slow transit of the colon associated with severe constipation after the Ripstein operation. A clinical and physiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 33:786–790Google Scholar