- Images
- Published:
Salpingoscopy in tubal endometriosis
Gynecological Surgery volume 8, pages 71–72 (2011)
A 35-year-old woman underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for primary infertility of 3-year duration, without associated pain symptoms. No ovulatory or male factors of infertility were present. She had previously undergone hysterosalpingography, which had revealed bilateral tubal patency 18 months before laparoscopy.
Laparoscopy revealed endometriosis implants on the right tube, with mild peritoneal scarring (Fig. 1). Both tubes were readily patent at blue dye injection. Minimal peritoneal endometriosis was present on the ipsilateral posterior leaf of the broad ligament and on the ipsilateral ovary.
The surgeon faced the decision whether to treat or not the implants visible on the tubal serosa. If, on one side, there is sound scientific evidence that the peritoneal endometriosis implants should be treated [1], the treatment of tubal implants on the other side is not clear cut, being this a rare occurrence. Surgical treatment of implants on the tubal serosa, either by excision or ablation, may in fact carry the risk of creating additional scarring and retraction.
The surgeon decided to perform intraoperative salpingoscopy, with a 2.9-mm diagnostic hysteroscope and a 3.7-mm single-flow diagnostic sheath introduced through an accessory port. Salpingoscopy is still routinely used in our departments in case of tubal disease, despite the fact that it is not generally included in the evaluation of the infertile couple elsewhere [2]. Lately, we have been using a small-caliber hysteroscope, as in this case, instead of the original instrumentation for salpingoscopy [3], since it is more readily available and does not need dedicated instruments. The endoscopic evaluation of the tube (Fig. 2) revealed a normal tubal mucosa (class 1 according to Brosens' classification [3]), no evidence of endometriosis in the tubal mucosa, and no evidence of stenosis of the tubal wall. It was, therefore, decided to leave the tubal endometriosis untreated.
Three months after surgery, the patient spontaneously conceived an intrauterine pregnancy.
References
Jacobson TZ, Barlow DH, Koninckx PR et al (2002) Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001398
Marana R, Ferrari S, Astorri AL, Muzii L (2008) Indications to tubal reconstructive surgery in the era of IVF. Gynecol Surg 5:85–91
Brosens IA, Boeckx W, Delattin P (1987) Salpingoscopy: a new preoperative diagnostic tool in tubal infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:768–773
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muzii, L., Marana, R. Salpingoscopy in tubal endometriosis. Gynecol Surg 8, 71–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0583-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0583-2