From: Aberrant obturator vessels in minimally invasive pelvic lymph node dissection
N | % of the cases with aberrant obturator vessel (n = 58) | % of all cases (n = 133) | |
---|---|---|---|
Arterial type | 1 | 1.72 | 0.07 |
OA arises from EIA | 0 | – | – |
OA arises from IEA | 1 | 1.72 | 0.07 |
Venous type | 50 | 86.20 | 37.50 |
OV drains in EIV | 31 | 53.44 | 23.30 |
OV drains in IEV | 11 | 18.96 | 8.27 |
Venous anastomosis between OV and EIV | 2 | 3.44 | 1.50 |
Venous anastomosis between OV and IEV | 0 | – | – |
OV drains in EIV + OV drains in IEV | 1 | 1.72 | 0.07 |
OV drains in EIV + venous anastomosis between OV and EIV | 3 | 5.17 | 2.25 |
OV drains in EIV + venous anastomosis between OV and EIV | 1 | 1.72 | 0.07 |
OV drains in IEV + venous anastomosis between OV and IEV | 1 | 1.72 | 0.07 |
Arterial and venous variation | 7 | 12.06 | 5.26 |
OА arises from EIА + OV drains in EIV | 3 | 5.17 | 2.25 |
OА arises from EIА + OV drains in IEV | 0 | – | – |
OА arises from IEА + OV drains in EIV | 2 | 3.44 | 1.50 |
OA arises from IEА + OV drains in EIV | 2 | 3.44 | 1.50 |
Total | 58 | 100 | 43.60 |