Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The impact of previous cesarean section on the outcome of patients with non-adherent placenta previa

Gynecological Surgery volume 18, Article number: 5 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of previous lower segment cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes of patients with non-adherent placenta previa

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients who delivered at a tertiary referral university hospital by lower uterine cesarean section with non-adherent placenta previa, over a 10-year period. Data were obtained through hospital registry and medical records. The differences in demographic, obstetric characteristics, peripartum complications, and fetal outcome between patients with no previous cesarean and those with previous cesarean section were analyzed.

Results

Ninety patients with non-adherent placenta previa were included, 54 patients with no previous cesarean and 36 patients with previous cesarean section. Patients with previous cesarean section were significantly more likely to incur inadvertent organ injury, transfusion of 4 or more units of packed red blood cells, transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, uterine brace compressive sutures, uterine artery ligation, and peripartum hysterectomy.

Conclusion

There is a significant increase in the incidence of inadvertent neighboring viscus injury, transfusion of 4 units or more of packed red blood cells, transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, uterine brace compressive sutures, uterine artery ligation, and peripartum hysterectomy in patients with non-adherent placenta previa and previous cesarean section, compared to those with non-adherent placenta previa and no previous history of cesarean section, with no difference in perinatal outcome.

Introduction

Although the etiology of placenta previa (PP) remains unclear, many studies show that the incidence of PP has been rising in parallel with the increasing rate of cesarean delivery [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Worldwide, the rate of primary and overall cesarean sections (CS) has been steadily and significantly rising. This increase has been attributed to multiple factors including increased maternal requests and obstetricians’ preference [8, 9]. This rise is despite its associated morbidities and the increased incidence of PP in future pregnancies [10,11,12].

Placenta previa is associated with the increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [13, 14]. This risk is more pronounced in the case of morbidly adherent placenta previa (MAPP) accreta, increta, and percreta. While the maternal risk related to morbidly adherent placenta previa is well established [14,15,16], few studies have explored the outcome of non-adherent placenta previa in patients with previous one or more lower uterine segment cesarean section (LUSCS).

This study was conducted to determine the impact of previous cesarean section on the maternal and fetal outcomes among patients with non-adherent PP, compared to patients with non-adherent PP and no previous LUSCS.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was conducted over a period of 10 years (January 2007–December 2017), of patients with non-adherent PP at a tertiary care referral hospital that is affiliated to the Jordan University of Science and Technology. This hospital serves a wide geographical area in the North of Jordan with a current delivery rate of 3000 per year. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of PP is basically performed by properly trained obstetric consultants. Doppler studies are used in suspected MAPP. The hospital has 24-h blood transfusion services with surgical and medical teams available on request. Delivery is usually performed by specialists or trained senior resident staff members. Hospital registry was searched for all women who delivered during the study period because of PP by CS or cesarean hysterectomy (both elective and emergency). The demographic and obstetric characteristics were collected from their computerized medical records. Patients with MAPP were excluded from the study. Operative notes were double checked to ascertain placental localization. Intra- and postoperative complications that included organ injury, uterine brace sutures, uterine artery ligation, peripartum hysterectomy, blood transfusion, transfer to the ICU, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded. The perinatal outcome included all the following: GA at delivery, Apgar scores, NICU admissions, birth weight, and the need for surfactant.

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 20). Differences in demographic, obstetric characteristics, peripartum complications, and fetal outcome between PP patients with no previous CS and those with previous CS were analyzed using t-test or chi-square test as appropriate. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Jordan University of Science and Technology.

Results

This study included 119 patients with PP. Of those, 29 were excluded because of morbidly adherent placenta. There were 90 patients with non-adherent placenta previa, of which 54 patients were with no previous CS and 36 patients with previous CS. Of the latter group, 15 were with previous one CS, 12 with previous two CSs, and 9 with previous three CSs or more. The highest number of previous CS in the study group was 6. Patients with previous CS were significantly older, had higher number of deliveries, and were more likely to have previous miscarriages and evacuations compared to patients with no previous CS (Table 1). Anterior and central placental locations were more common in patients with previous CS. The two groups of patients did not differ significantly in relation to antenatal hemorrhage, indications for delivery, and gestational age at delivery.

Table 1 The demographic and obstetric characteristics of patients with cesarean section history
Full size table

Patients with previous CS were significantly more likely to experience organ injury (all were bladder injury ), transfusion of 4 units or more of packed red blood cells, transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, uterine brace compressive sutures, uterine artery ligation, and peripartum hysterectomy than those with no previous CS. Both groups had similar rates of ICU admissions and postoperative hospital stay (Table 2).

Table 2 Peripartum complications among patients and cesarean section history
Full size table

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in relation to gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, birth weight, and admission to NICU (Table 3).

Table 3 Perinatal complications among patients with cesarean section history
Full size table

Discussion

Placenta previa complicates 0.4% of all deliveries, with a significant increase in incidence in the last two decades, mainly due to the increased rate of cesarean sections worldwide [2, 13, 16]. International concerns over this increase prompted the WHO to address this subject e e[17]. In addition, the adverse health outcomes associated with cesarean birth for mothers and newborns are well-documented [11, 12, 18].

Furthermore, the rate of MAPP has increased as a result of more previous cesarean sections with higher rates of maternal and perinatal complications [14, 15, 19, 20]. Past studies have heavily focused on the relationship between previous CS and MAPP, but not much so on the impact of previous cesarean section on PP that is not adherent.

This study demonstrated that patients with prior LUSCS were more likely to incur intraoperative organ injury, transfusion of 4 or more units of PRBC, transfusion of FFP, and hysterectomy. These findings are comparable to the results of other studies of patients with previous CS but without PP, where complications did progressively increase by each additional CS [14, 16, 21]. This finding was not confirmed by this study.

Ayaz et al., in a relatively smaller sample size study of multiparous patients with previous CS and PP, demonstrated an increased risk of blood transfusion, coagulopathy, and prolonged length of hospital stay. Unlike this study, they did not find a higher risk of hysterectomy or organ injury in patients with PP and previous CS [22]. Similar to this study, there was no significant difference in gestational age at delivery, mean Apgar score, rate of admission to the NICU, and perinatal outcome between the two groups, having in mind possible confounding effects due to a significant difference in age and parity between the two groups.

One of the limitations of this study is the lack of multivariate regression analysis due to the small number of some peripartum complications. Perhaps, future studies with larger sample size could confirm the findings of this study.

Conclusion

There is a significant increase in the incidence of neighboring viscus injury, transfusion of 4 or more units of packed red blood cells, transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, uterine brace compressive sutures, uterine artery ligation, and hysterectomy in patients with non-adherent PP and previous CS, compared to those with non-adherent PP and no previous CS, with no statistically significant difference in perinatal outcome between the two groups of patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

CS:

Cesarean section

LUSCS:

Lower uterine segment cesarean section

MAPP:

Morbidly adherent placenta previa

PP:

Placenta previa

References

  1. Ananth CV, Demissie K, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2003) Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M, Mazor M (2001) Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med 10(6):414–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parazzini F, Dindelli M, Luchini L, La Rosa M, Potenza MT, Frigerio L et al (1994) Risk factors for placenta praevia. Placenta 15(3):321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frederiksen MC, Glassenberg R, Stika CS (1999) Placenta previa: a 22-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(6 Pt 1):1432–1437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hershkowitz R, Fraser D, Mazor M, Leiberman JR (1995) One or multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62(2):185–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendricks MS, Chow YH, Bhagavath B, Singh K (1999) Previous cesarean section and abortion as risk factors for developing placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25(2):137–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beckett MG, Allton CR, Davies CT, Davis I, Flynn JM, Grant EJ et al (2009) Building a scientific data grid with DiGS. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 367(1897):2471–2481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naftalin J, Paterson-Brown S (2008) A pilot study exploring the impact of maternal age and raised body mass index on caesarean section rates. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(4):394–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas J, Callwood A, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report 2001. 20 p.

  10. Tan WC, Devendra K, Tan AS (2003) Changing trends in indications for caesarean sections in a tertiary hospital. Ann Acad Med Singapore 32(3):299–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E (2008) Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol 35(2):293–307 v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM (2001) Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 97(3):439–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (1997) The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(5):1071–1078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1226–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Esakoff TF, Sparks TN, Kaimal AJ, Kim LH, Feldstein VA, Goldstein RB et al (2011) Diagnosis and morbidity of placenta accreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(3):324–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I, Obeidat B, Zayed F, Khader YS, Obeidat N (2014) Morbidly adherent placenta previa in current practice: prediction and maternal morbidity in a series of 23 women who underwent hysterectomy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(17):1734–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organisation. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–7.

  18. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P et al (2010) Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 375(9713):490–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrabadi A, Hutcheon JA, Liu S, Bartholomew S, Kramer MS, Liston RM et al (2015) Contribution of placenta accreta to the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 125(4):814–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rouse DJ, MacPherson C, Landon M, Varner MW, Leveno KJ, Moawad AH et al (2006) Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 108(4):891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ayaz A, Farooq MU (2012) Risk of adverse maternal and peri-natal outcome in subjects with placenta previa with previous cesarean section. Kurume Med J 59(1-2):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the study participants and the Jordan University of Science and Technology.

Funding

No funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box: 630001, Irbid, 22110, Jordan

    Amer Sindiani & Nail Obeidat

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan

    Omar Abu-Azzam

  3. Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

    Heba Hijazi

Authors
  1. Amer Sindiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nail Obeidat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omar Abu-Azzam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heba Hijazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AS: Design, concept, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing. NO: Data analysis and manuscript writing. OA-A: Data collection and analysis. HH: Manuscript writing and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amer Sindiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study method and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University Hospital, Jordan University of Science and Technology.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sindiani, A., Obeidat, N., Abu-Azzam, O. et al. The impact of previous cesarean section on the outcome of patients with non-adherent placenta previa. Gynecol Surg 18, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-021-01090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-021-01090-x

Keywords