d'Arcangues C (2007) Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception 75(6 Suppl):S2–S7
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marchi NM, Castro S, Hidalgo MM, Hidalgo C, Monteiro-Dantas C, Villarroeal M et al (2012) Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives. Contraception 86(4):354–358
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O (2013) Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Hum Reprod 28(6):1546–1551
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boortz HE, Margolis DJ, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM (2012) Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care. Radiographics 32(2):335–352
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rahnemai-Azar AA, Apfel T, Naghshizadian R, Cosgrove JM, Farkas DT (2014) Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine. JSLS 18(3):e2014.00122.1-5
Kho KA, Chamsy DJ (2014) Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(4):596–601
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Agacayak E, Tunc SY, Icen MS, Oguz A, Ozler A, Turgut A et al (2015) Evaluation of predisposing factors, diagnostic and treatment methods in patients with translocation of intrauterine devices. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41(5):735–741
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA (2012) Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. JSLS 16(2):236–241
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD (2015) Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on intrauterine devices. Contraception 91(4):274–279
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S (2003) Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8(3):150–155
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D (2003) Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 67(1):53–56
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harrison-Woolrych M, Zhou L, Coulter D (2003) Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand. N Z Med J 116(1179):U538
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O (2012) Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation—a population-based study. Hum Reprod 27(9):2658–2663
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van Grootheest AC, Salemans TH, Dunselman GA (2006) Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 73(3):257–260
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhou L, Harrison-Woolrych M, Coulter DM (2003) Use of the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme to study the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (Mirena). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 12(5):371–377
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I (1998) Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 57(4):251–255
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S (1983) Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 61(1):31–36
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R (1981) Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 36(7):335–353
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wildemeersch D, Hasskamp T, Goldstuck N (2015) Intrauterine devices that do not fit well cause side effects, become embedded, or are expelled and can even perforate the uterine wall. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(2):309–310
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D (2002) Insertion of the Multiload Cu375 intrauterine device; experience in over 16,000 New Zealand women. Contraception 66(6):387–391
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li Yong Ping KLB, Rowe PJ, De Wei Z, Xian WS, Yin ZH, Wu Z (1994) The demographic impact of conversion from steel to copper IUDs in China. Int Fam Plan Perspect 20(4):124–130
Article
Google Scholar
Cheung VY (2010) Sonographic appearances of Chinese intrauterine devices. J Ultrasound Med 29(7):1093–1101
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheung VY (2010) A 10-year experience in removing Chinese intrauterine devices. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109(3):219–222
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhang S, Li Y, Yu P, Chen T, Zhou W, Zhang W et al (2015) In vitro release of cupric ion from intrauterine devices: influence of frame, shape, copper surface area and indomethacin. Biomed Microdevices 17(1):19
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhao S, Deng J, Wang Y, Bi S, Wang X, Qin W et al (2014) Experience and levels of satisfaction with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in China: a prospective multicenter survey. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:1449–1455
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cao X, Zhang W, Gao G, Van Kets H, Wildemeersch D (2000) Randomized comparative trial in parous women of the frameless GyneFix and the TCu380A intrauterine devices: long-term experience in a Chinese family planning clinic. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 5(2):135–140
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D (2014) Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Womens Health 6:735–744
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Goldstuck ND, Holloway G (1988) IUD insertion forces: effects of recent childbirth and lactation. Adv Contracept 4(2):159–164
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bilian X (2007) Chinese experience with intrauterine devices. Contraception 75(6 Suppl):S31–S34
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Su S, Zhao Z, Feng S, Dong B (2012) A novel medical device for removal of intrauterine devices under direct vision. Contraception 86(5):583–586
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Balci O, Mahmoud AS, Capar M, Colakoglu MC (2010) Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(6):1019–1022
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1987) Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 753:1-91
Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y (2002) Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 66(2):105–108
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adoni A, Ben CA (1991 Jan) The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception 43(1):77–81
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar