Skip to main content

Elective uterine artery embolization prior to laparoscopic resection of interstitial pregnancy: two cases and literature review

Abstract

Background

Interstitial pregnancies (IP) can be treated medically or surgically. The most common complication remains hemorrhage. The risk of that may be reduced by elective uterine artery embolization (UAE) prior to surgery, which we applied in two consecutive cases with high vascularization on ultrasound. We also reviewed larger series (n ≥ 10) on medical as well as surgical management of IP on success and complication rates and reviewed the entire literature on UAE.

Results

A gravida 5 (two ectopic pregnancies treated by salpingectomy) para 1 (cesarean section complicated by a niche, earlier repaired) presented with an asymptomatic IP. Primary treatment consisted of systemic methotrexate (MTX). Because of raising β-hCG and persisting heart activity 1 week later, she was referred for surgery (β-hCG = 59,000 IU/L; CRL = 10.5 mm). Another gravida 5 para 3 presented with an asymptomatic evolutive IP on dating ultrasound. Because of the size (CRL = 24.5 mm), thin overlaying myometrium, and high β-hCG (121,758 IU/L), we opted for primary surgery. Both IPs were highly vascularized with high flow rates. To prevent bleeding, a bilateral UAE was performed. The surgery was nearly bloodless.

In the literature, a wide range of treatment regimens for IP is reported. Larger series report a success rate of 76% for primary systemic MTX, 88% for primary local medical treatment, and 94% for primary surgery. It was not possible to determine reliable hemorrhage or rupture rates following MTX administration. As to laparoscopic surgery, the blood transfusion rate for bleeding was 9% while the conversion rate for hemorrhage was 2%. The use of UAE to reduce the risk for hemorrhage before (n = 2) or after (n = 19) MTX administration was reported in 21 cases. This failed in two cases (90% success rate), and one patient required transfusion (5%). Two cases treated with UAE and primary surgery were reported, yet the exact indication for embolization was not elaborated. Alternative hemostatic techniques during surgical management have been proposed to reduce blood loss and operating time, yet individual outcomes were not identifiable.

Conclusion

We report on the use of elective UAE prior to laparoscopic resection of IP, because of signs of strong vascularization on ultrasound. This strategy coincided with a nearly bloodless operation. Literature review suggests that this is one of the effective methods to reduce blood loss intra-operatively.

Background

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is any type of pregnancy in which the fertilized ovum implants outside the uterine cavity. The vast majority of EPs are situated in the fallopian tube, typically in the ampullary region (70%), less likely in the isthmic (12%), fimbrial (11%), or interstitial part (2–4%). Other uncommon locations include ovarian (1–3%), abdominal (< 1%), cervical (< 1%), rudimentary horn (< 0.5%), and cesarean scar pregnancies (1–3%) [1,2,3,4].

In 1989, EPs occurred at an estimated prevalence of 1–2% worldwide. This is two to three times higher than in 1970 [5]. The increase is presumably related to an increased prevalence of risk factors directly or indirectly leading to decreased tubal passage. The prevalence has since not significantly changed [6, 7].

Pregnancies that are situated in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube are referred to as interstitial [8, 9]. The intramural or interstitial part of the tube is approximately 0.7 mm wide and 1–2 cm long, often with a tortuous course [8]. Interstitial pregnancies (IPs) are also referred to as “cornual,” though some reserve this entity to pregnancies located within a rudimentary horn of an abnormal uterine cavity [8, 9]. While the generic risk factors displayed in Table 1 may also apply, specific risk factors to this type of EP are previous ipsilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, previous EP, in vitro fertilization, and tubal damage from previous EP [8]. Historically, the mortality rate of this condition was around 2.5%, which is approximately seven times higher than that of EPs in general. It is assumed that this can be explained by the greater expansion capacity at this location, the richer vascularization of the area, eventually leading to life-threatening hemorrhage when rupture occurs [8].

Table 1 Risk factors of ectopic pregnancy [19,20,21,22,23]

There is to our knowledge no consensus on the best treatment modality of IP. Herein, we provide a literature review which we did on the occasion of treating two patients with uterine artery embolization (UAE) immediately prior surgical treatment, because of an anticipated high risk for bleeding.

Two cases

A 28-year-old gravida 5 para 1 was referred for a second opinion on an evolutive IP. She had a history of a primary cesarean section for vasa previa, a spontaneous first trimester miscarriage, two EPs treated by salpingectomy, and a hysteroscopic cesarean scar niche repair. The latter niche repair was done because of ultrasound signs of fluid in the niche before starting in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. On hysteroscopy, blood and debris were confirmed and a repair was performed 4 months prior to the index event (IP). Control hysteroscopy 1 month after the procedure showed normal findings. The index pregnancy was by IVF. On early scan at 6 + 6 weeks, an IP was suspected. We confirmed this at 7 + 1 weeks to be a left IP with a gestational sac of 19 × 20 mm, CRL of 6.8 mm, β-hCG of 38,000 IU/L, and heart activity. There was no abdominal fluid. The referring center opted for a single-dose methotrexate (MTX) protocol (75 mg; 50 mg/m2). She presented on day one post-injection with stinging and cramping abdominal pain, yet without hemodynamic impact or peritoneal signs. On day six post-injection, she was referred because of raising β-hCG and persisting heart activity, spotting, along with intermittent abdominal pain. Figure 1 displays the ultrasound, β-hCG, and hemoglobin findings over the reporting period. We decided to proceed with surgical intervention yet opted for prior bilateral UAE during the same general anesthesia to reduce the risk for hemorrhage based on the apparent high vascularization around the pregnancy. Access was gained through the right femoral artery with catheterization of the left internal iliac artery followed by selective catheterization of the left uterine artery. Polyvinyl particles (Contour 250-350, Boston Scientific, Diegem, Belgium) were injected under 3D angiography control. The same procedure was followed on the contralateral side. Then, a laparoscopic cornual resection was performed and the uterine defect was closed in two layers using Vicryl 2-0 (Fig. 2). Blood loss was negligible, yet operating time was 140 min. Histopathology confirmed an IP. She was discharged on day two, and β-hCG became unmeasurable 4 weeks later. She had a withdrawal bleeding 3 weeks after the operation and had another period 5 weeks later. A waiting period of at least 6 months [10, 11] was advised to allow maximal healing of the uterus. She conceived 8 months after the IP in the first IVF cycle. She presented again with right fossa pain at 5 + 3 weeks, yet ultrasound confirmed an intracavitary position without any signs of IP.

Fig. 1
figure1

Case 1: clinical, biochemical and ultrasound findings (day 0 = day of surgery)

Fig. 2
figure2

Case 1: Left: left interstitial pregnancy, preventive coagulation around insertion line. Middle: status post cornual resection and closure of uterine defect with gestational sac in the pouch of Douglas. Right: gestational sac bulging out of resection piece

A 32-year-old gravida 5 para 3 spontaneously conceived. She was referred because on elective dating ultrasound at 9 + 2 weeks a right evolutive IP was found. She had a history of a spontaneous first trimester miscarriage and three uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries. On ultrasound, the surrounding myometrium was 2.2 mm which was strongly vascularized (Fig. 3). Because of the size (CRL = 24.5 mm), the thin myometrial layer, and a β-hCG of 121,758 IU/L, we advocated immediate surgery, yet because of the vascularization we first offered bilateral UAE. Polyvinyl particles (Contour 355-500, Boston Scientific; Embosphere 500-700 and 700-900, Merit Medical, Brussels, Belgium) and spongostan plugs (Ethicon, Diegem, Belgium) were used (Fig. 4). On laparoscopy, a 6-cm pregnancy in the right uterine horn was observed. The pregnancy was removed by cornuostomy, and the myometrial defect was sutured in three layers (first V-loc 2-0, second and third Vicryl 2-0). Blood loss was negligible, and operating time was 180 min. Two months later she still had some brown vaginal discharge. Ultrasound showed normal findings with a strong proliferative endometrium along with a corpus luteum on the left ovary and a normal looking scar at the resection site. β-hCG was 3.2 IU/L.

Fig. 3
figure3

Case 2: interstitial pregnancy on ultrasound: Left: 2D image showing high flow in the thin surrounding myometrium. Right: 3D rendered image showing the interstitial localization

Fig. 4
figure4

Case 2: Left: 3D CT angiography after contrast injection in the right iliac artery visualizing the right interstitial pregnancy (arrow). Middle: before embolization of the right uterine artery. Right: after embolization of the right uterine artery

Both patients explicitly consented to have their history being reported in the literature.

Methods

For the literature review, we searched the PubMed on this matter, published until February 2018, using the following key terms “Pregnancy, Interstitial”[Mesh], “Therapeutics”[Mesh], “Interstitial Pregnancy,” and “Pregnancy Treatment” (953 papers). Sources of relevant articles in the references were screened as well (> 100 papers). All English-, French-, Dutch- and German-language articles were retrieved and screened on title and abstract for relevance (Appendix 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Articles in which the location of the EP was unclear or in which the outcome was not clearly specified or objectively measured were excluded. We empirically decided to further discuss outcomes of series with 10 patients or more as to have reasonable denominators for calculating overall outcomes. The only exception to that was Table 4, which displays the entire published experience with UAE. There was not a single series with ≥ 10 patients treated with UAE.

Results

There is considerable experience with primary systemic medical therapy in asymptomatic hemodynamically stable patients with IP. Table 2 summarizes studies describing ten or more patients with IP treated by primary systemic MTX. Dosing and regimen of MTX are inconsistent, and success rates are typically over 70%, except in one series [12]. In case of failure (persisting β-hCG leading to additional treatment), surgery was offered, except in one series by Hiersch et al., where second-line local MTX was combined with UAE. Out of five patients, two still required surgery as a third step. Tanaka et al. described 33 cases treated with a very consistent scheme of slowly intravenously injected, yet a fixed dose MTX. The success rate was 94%; two patients required surgery. The opposite was true in the experience of Kim et al. (n = 30) administering intramuscular MTX, yet with an inconsistent dosing regimen. Sixteen (53%) required additional surgery.

Table 2 Primary systemic MTX treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Local injection of MTX, potassium chloride (KCL), etoposide, and actinomycin D under laparoscopic, ultrasound, or hysteroscopic guidance have all been reported as effective (Table 3 and Appendix 2). These injections are usually given into the gestational sac, occasionally in the surrounding myometrium or locally intra-arterial. These are invasive procedures, compared to systemic MTX. Benifla et al. used MTX for IP locations and KCl for heterotopic presentations, out of concerns for teratogenicity. Of the three eutopic pregnancies associated to a heterotopic location, two were eventually lost. Further details on outcomes are missing. The calculated success rate was 88%. Treatment failures were not offered a second MTX injection, yet successfully managed by surgery.

Table 3 Primary local medical treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Table 4 displays reports on patients managed with selective UAE combined with any administration regimen of MTX. The actual indication for secondary UAE was refusal of surgery (Ophir et al., Yang et al.; each n = 1) or not mentioned (Deruelle et al., Tamarit et al., Berretta et al., Hiersch et al.). Primary UAE combined with MTX was either part of a standard protocol (n = 9; Krissi et al.) or because of the suspicion of increased risk for hemorrhage (n = 1; Valsky et al.). The paper does however not mention how that increased risk was estimated. Table 4 also includes two cases managed by UAE followed immediately by planned surgery (either laparoscopic or hysteroscopic). The argument for UAE was made based on increased vascularization on 3D CT angiography. In one of those two cases, a subsequent spontaneous conception and cesarean delivery of a healthy baby at 37 weeks was reported. Overall success rate in all the series in this table is 91%.

Table 4 Primary and secondary treatment of interstitial pregnancy with elective UAE

Table 5 displays the experience with primary surgery, typically by minimally invasive access. Success rate was 94%; transfusion need was 9%. Primary laparotomy was performed for tubal rupture, in case of severe adhesions (Tulandi et al.) or because of surgeon’s preference (Hwang et al.). Conversions were because of significant hematoperitoneum or because of uncontrolled bleeding perioperatively (n = 7; 2%).

Table 5 Primary surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Discussion

Today the diagnosis of EP is usually made by ultrasound. In high-risk patients or countries where access to early ultrasound is easy, the diagnosis can be made prior to the development of symptoms. This allows careful planning of management. We surgically managed two cases of IP, which both were initially asymptomatic. One had typical risk factors and the other one did not. One had prior MTX therapy, and the second one had a very high β-hCG level. Both the ultrasound examination raised the suspicion of a highly vascularized lesion. Therefore, we decided to perform primarily bilateral UAE and surgery in the same anesthesia. This is different than the cases managed in Table 4. Though it is impossible to prove that UAE reduces the risk for hemorrhage, it seems that our surgery in both cases was nearly bloodless. Treatment was apparently also effective given that β-hCG levels fell as expected.

When systematically searching the literature, a gap of knowledge is identified on the use of UAE or in a broader perspective, the management of IP. This is probably because of the rarity of the condition. The data around do neither allow a proper meta-analysis, so that we limited ourselves to summarize the findings in somewhat larger series for each management option. There is quite some experience with primary medical therapy in asymptomatic hemodynamically stable patients. In analogy to other ectopic locations [13], the variability of MTX administration protocols is wide, including systemic single shot (either promptly or slowly infused), repetitive doses, and local administration [13]. Medical therapy has also been combined with UAE, mostly successful, yet Hiersch et al. reports on two cases where second line local MTX treatment combined with UAE failed. In those, we would guess the patient would have had more benefit of surgery.

Our literature review learns that the most frequent complication of surgery is hemorrhage, either with or without transfusion. The overall transfusion rate in IP is not judgeable since no reference to that outcome was made in any of the medically treated cases. However, 9% of laparoscopically managed IPs required blood transfusion. Therefore, it seems logical to take measures to reduce that risk. Surgically, one can use prophylactic coagulation by electrosurgery or ligation of the feeding artery, yet this may compromise viability of the tissue. Alternatively, vasoconstrictors have been described to reduce blood loss and operating time, yet they may have their own side effects and have only been reported to be effective for IPs with an average β-hCG of 10,000–25,000 IU/L [8, 14, 15]. Conversely, these are very cheap agents.

Modern invasive radiologic techniques are becoming increasingly popular, and those services become more widely accessible even in a semi-acute setting. Embolization techniques have found their place in modern obstetrics and gynecology. The experience with uterine myomas is meanwhile very large, and subsequent conception seems to be possible and relatively safe [16]. Torre et al. described an insignificant change in fertility rate and ovarian reserve after UAE for uterine fibroids in women with no other infertility factors [16]. Krissi et al. reported on the subsequent fertility after MTX administration with UAE in the treatment IP. Out of five women who tried to conceive, four did so, and three delivered successfully. Disadvantages of UAE are the higher cost in comparison to vasopressin, the longer duration of anesthesia, the more complicated logistics, and the additional local morbidity (e.g. ischemic pain, Asherman syndrome) [17, 18].

Conclusions

We report on the use of elective UAE prior to laparoscopic resection of IP, which coincided with a nearly bloodless operation. A literature search shows a wide variety of treatment options, yet most cases seem to be following the typical approach to EP. The overall success rate of surgical treatment of IP is higher than that of medical treatment. When performing laparoscopy, good hemostatic techniques are recommended since the operation takes place in a strongly vascularized region [8, 14, 15]. Our experience with two cases of UAE is yet another approach. It seems safe and reliable and does not preclude future conception.

Abbreviations

EP:

Ectopic pregnancy

IP:

Interstitial pregnancy

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

KCL:

Potassium chloride

MTX:

Methotrexate

UAE:

Uterine artery embolization

References

  1. 1.

    Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N (2002) Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod 17(12):3224–3230.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ramkrishna J, Kan GR, Reidy KL, Ang WC, Palma-Dias R (2017) Comparison of management regimens following ultrasound diagnosis of nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 125(5):567–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chetty M, Elson J (2009) Treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(4):529–538.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alalade AO, Smith FJE, Kendall CE, Odejinmi F (2017) Evidence-based management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol 37(8):982–991.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Goldner TE, Lawson HW, Xia Z, Atrash HK (1993) Surveillance for ectopic pregnancy - United States 1970-1989. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries 42:73–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jurkovic D, Wilkinson H (2011) Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ 342:d3397.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Jonat W et al (2013) Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 68(8):571–581.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Moawad NS, Mahajan ST, Moniz MH, Taylor SE, Hurd WW (2010) Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):15–29.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lau S, Tulandi T (1999) Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72(2):207–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Faioli R, Berretta R, Dall’Asta A, Di Serio M, Galli L, Monica M et al (2016) Endoloop technique for laparoscopic cornuectomy: a safe and effective approach for the treatment of interstitial pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42(8):1034–1037.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Manea C, Pavlidou E, Urias AA, Bouquet de la Joliniere J, Dubuisson JB, Feki A (2014) Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy and fertility outcomes after ipsilateral salpingectomy - three case reports. Front Surg 1:34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim MJ, Cha JH, Bae HS, Kim MK, Kim ML, Yun BS et al (2017) Therapeutic outcomes of methotrexate injection in unruptured interstitial pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Sci 60(6):571–578.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC (2015) Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract 1:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Moon HS, Kim SG, Park GS, Choi JK, Koo JS, Joo BS. Efficacy of bleeding control using a large amount of highly diluted vasopressin in laparoscopic treatment for interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(1):30 e1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cucinella G, Calagna G, Rotolo S, Granese R, Saitta S, Tonni G et al (2014) Interstitial pregnancy: a ‘road map’ of surgical treatment based on a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Investig 78(3):141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Torre A, Fauconnier A, Kahn V, Limot O, Bussierres L, Pelage JP (2017) Fertility after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic multiple fibroids with no other infertility factors. Eur Radiol 27(7):2850–2859.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang SB, Lee SJ, Joe HS, Goo DE, Chang YW, Kim DH (2007) Selective uterine artery embolization for management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Korean J Radiol 8(2):176–179.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Song D, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Li TC, Zhou F, Xia E (2014) A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6):1022–1028.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li C, Zhao WH, Zhu Q, Cao SJ, Ping H, Xi X et al (2015) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly J-L, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L et al (2003) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 157(3):185–194.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ankum WM, Mol BWJ, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PMM (1996) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis**supported in part by grant OG 93/007 from the Ziekenfonds-Raad, Amstelveen, the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 65(6):1093–1099.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Backman T, Rauramo I, Huhtala S, Koskenvuo M (2004) Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):50–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Xiong X, Buekens P, Wollast E (1995) IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Contraception 52(1):23–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jermy K, Thomas J, Doo A, Bourne T (2004) The conservative management of interstitial pregnancy. BJOG 111(11):1283–1288.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hiersch L, Krissi H, Ashwal E, From A, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y (2014) Effectiveness of medical treatment with methotrexate for interstitial pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 54(6):576–580.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tanaka K, Baartz D, Khoo SK (2015) Management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with intravenous methotrexate: an extended study of a standardised regimen. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 55(2):176–180.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Benifla JL, Fernandez H, Sebban E, Darai E, Frydman R, Madelenat P (1996) Alternative to surgery of treatment of unruptured interstitial pregnancy: 15 cases of medical treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 70(2):151–156.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cassik P, Ofili-Yebovi D, Yazbek J, Lee C, Elson J, Jurkovic D (2005) Factors influencing the success of conservative treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26(3):279–282.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Framarino-dei-Malatesta M, Piccioni MG, Derme M, Polidori NF, Tibaldi V, Iannini I et al (2014) Transabdominal ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic interstitial pregnancies. J Clin Ultrasound 42(9):522–526.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Valsky DV, Hamani Y, Verstandig A, Yagel S (2007) The use of 3D rendering, VCI-C, 3D power Doppler and B-flow in the evaluation of interstitial pregnancy with arteriovenous malformation treated by selective uterine artery embolization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(3):352–355.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Takeda A, Koyama K, Imoto S, Mori M, Sakai K, Nakamura H (2009) Successful management of interstitial pregnancy with fetal cardiac activity by laparoscopic-assisted cornual resection with preoperative transcatheter uterine artery embolization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(2):305–308.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Krissi H, Hiersch L, Stolovitch N, Nitke S, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y (2014) Outcome, complications and future fertility in women treated with uterine artery embolization and methotrexate for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 182:172–176.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Takeda A, Koike W, Hayashi S, Imoto S, Nakamura H (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography for conservative management of proximal interstitial pregnancy by hysteroscopic resection after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(4):658–662.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ophir E, Singer-Jordan J, Oettinger M, Odeh M, Tendler R, Feldman Y et al (2004) Uterine artery embolization for management of interstitial twin ectopic pregnancy: case report. Hum Reprod 19(8):1774–1777.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Deruelle P, Lucot J-P, Lions C, Robert Y (2005) Management of interstitial pregnancy using selective uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 106(5):1165–1167.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tamarit G, Lonjedo E, Gonzalez M, Tamarit S, Domingo S, Pellicer A. Combined use of uterine artery embolization and local methotrexate injection in interstitial ectopic pregnancies with poor prognosis. Fertil Steril 2010;93(4):1348 e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Berretta R, Merisio C, Dall'Asta A, Verrotti C, Rolla M, Bruni S et al (2014) Conservative treatment for interstitial monochorionic twin pregnancy: case report and review of the published work. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(3):829–832.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Moon HS, Choi YJ, Park YH, Kim SG (2000) New simple endoscopic operations for interstitial pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(1).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D (2004) Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeons Registry. Obstet Gynecol 103(1):47–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    MacRae R, Olowu O, Rizzuto MI, Odejinmi F (2009) Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of 11 consecutive cases of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(1):59–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ng S, Hamontri S, Chua I, Chern B, Siow A (2009) Laparoscopic management of 53 cases of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92(2):448–452.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hwang JH, Lee JK, Lee NW, Lee KW (2011) Open cornual resection versus laparoscopic cornual resection in patients with interstitial ectopic pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156(1):78–82.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cai Z, Wang F, Cao H, Xia Q, Chen X, Cai Y (2012) The value of laparoscopy alone or combined with hysteroscopy in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy: analysis of 22 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(3):727–732.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zuo X, Shen A, Chen M (2012) Successful management of unruptured interstitial pregnancy in 17 consecutive cases by using laparoscopic surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52(4):387–390.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ahn JW, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Kang SP, Won HS (2013) Ultrasound-guided transcervical forceps extraction of unruptured interstitial pregnancy. BJOG 120(10):1285–1288.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Douysset X, Verspyck E, Diguet A, Marpeau L, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Rondeau S et al (2014) Interstitial pregnancy: experience at Rouen’s hospital. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 42(4):216–221.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Watanabe T, Watanabe Z, Watanabe T, Fujimoto K, Sasaki E (2014) Laparoscopic cornuotomy for interstitial pregnancy and postoperative course. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(8):1983–1988.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nikodijevic K, Bricou A, Benbara A, Moreaux G, Nguyen C, Carbillon L et al (2016) Cornual pregnancy: management and subsequent fertility. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 44(1):11–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nirgianakis K, Papadia A, Grandi G, McKinnon B, Bolla D, Mueller MD (2017) Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancies: a comparison between interstitial and “more distal” tubal pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(1):95–101.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wang J, Huang D, Lin X, Saravelos SH, Chen J, Zhang X et al (2016) Incidence of interstitial pregnancy after in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer and the outcome of a consecutive series of 38 cases managed by laparoscopic cornuostomy or cornual repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(5):739–747.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lee MH, Im SY, Kim MK, Shin SY, Park WI (2017) Comparison of laparoscopic cornual resection and cornuotomy for interstitial pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(3):397–401.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Tanaka T, Hayashi H, Kutsuzawa T, Fujimoto S, Ichinoe K (1982) Treatment of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate: report of a successful case. Fertil Steril 37(6):851–852.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hajenius PJ, Voigt RR, Engelsbel S, Mol BWJ, Hemrika DJ, Van der Veen F (1996) Serum human chorionic gonadotropin clearance curves in patients with interstitial pregnancy treated with systemic methotrexate**supported in part by grant OG 93/007 from the Health Insurance Funds Council, Amstelveen, the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 66(5):723–728.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Galimberti A, Jones MR (1997) Failure of conservative treatment with methotrexate for interstitial pregnancy despite progressive decrease of serial serum betaHCG. J Obstet Gynaecol 17(4):407–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bernardini L, Valenzano M, Foglia G (1998) Spontaneous interstitial pregnancy on a tubal stump after unilateral adenectomy followed by transvaginal colour Doppler ultrasound. Hum Reprod 13(6):1723–1726.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Fisch JD, Ortiz BH, Tazuke SI, Chitkara U, Giudice LC. Medical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review. 1998;13(7):1981–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sagiv R, Golan A, Arbel-Alon S, Glezerman M (2001) Three conservative approaches to treatment of interstitial pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 8(1):154–158.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lalchandani S, Geary M, O’Herlihy C, Sheil O (2003) Conservative management of placenta accreta and unruptured interstitial cornual pregnancy using methotrexate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107(1):96–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Verity L, Ludlow J, Dickinson JE (2003) Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: a contemporary case series. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 43:232–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Advincula AP, Senapati S (2004) Interstitial pregnancy. Fertil Steril 82(6):1660–1661.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Reid P, Buddha L (2004) Hysteroscopic diagnosis of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 111:89–90.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rodriguez L, Takacs P, Kang J (2004) Single-dose methotrexate for the management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84(3):271–272.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Klemm P, Koehler C, Eichhorn KH, Hillemanns P, Schneider A (2006) Sonographic monitoring of systemic and local methotrexate (MTX) therapy in patients with intact interstitial pregnancies. J Perinat Med 34(2):149–157.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Araujo Junior E, Zanforlin Filho SM, Pires CR, Guimaraes Filho HA, Massaguer AA, Nardozza LM et al (2007) Three-dimensional transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of early and asymptomatic interstitial pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275(3):207–210.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Fujioka S, Yamashita Y, Kawabe S, Kamegai H, Terai Y, Ohmichi M (2009) A case of a methotrexate-resistant ectopic pregnancy in which dactinomycin was effective as a second-line chemotherapy. Fertil Steril 91(3):929 e13–929 e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Api M, Api O (2010) Laparoscopic cornuotomy in the management of an advanced interstitial ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol 26(3):208–212.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gunenc Z, Bingol B, Celik A, Bozkurt S, Ozekici U (2010) Laparoscopic surgery of interstitial (cornual) pregnancy, a case report. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 11(2):102–104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kato S, Tanaka T, Terai Y, Yamashita Y, Ohmichi M (2011) Interstitial pregnancy treated by transcervical aspiration of the gestational sac combined with systemic and local administration of methotrexate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37(9):1250–1254.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lee ES, Hahn HS, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim JH, Kim YW (2011) Single-port laparoscopic cornual resection for a spontaneous cornual ectopic pregnancy following ipsilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 96(2):e106–e110.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gomez Garcia MT, Aguaron Benitez G, Barbera Belda B, Callejon Rodriguez C, Gonzalez Merlo G (2012) Medical therapy (methotrexate and mifepristone) alone or in combination with another type of therapy for the management of cervical or interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165(1):77–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Monia M, Atef Y, Manel M, Fethi B, Khaled N, Hedi R (2012) Traitement médicale des grossesses interstitielles non rompues. Tunis Méd 90(5):421–423.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    SzylitI N, Podgaec S, Traina E, Oliveira R (2012) Video laparoscopic intervention for an interstitial pregnancy after failure of clinical treatment. Sao Paulo Med J 130(3):202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sagiv R, Debby A, Keidar R, Kerner R, Golan A (2013) Interstitial pregnancy management and subsequent pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(11):1327–1330.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Surbone A, Cottier O, Vial Y, Francini K, Hohlfeld P, Achtari C (2013) Interstitial pregnancies’ diagnosis and management: an eleven cases series. Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13736.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Fritz RB, Rosenblum N, Gaither K, Sherman A, McCalla A (2014) Successful laparoscopically assisted transcervical suction evacuation of interstitial pregnancy following failed methotrexate injection in a community hospital setting. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014:695293.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Horne AW, Skubisz MM, Tong S, Duncan WC, Neil P, Wallace EM et al (2014) Combination gefitinib and methotrexate treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a case series. Hum Reprod 29(7):1375–1379.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Meddeb S, Rhim MS, Zarrouk W, Bibi M, Yacoubi MT, Khairi H (2014) Unusual gestational choriocarcinoma arising in an interstitial pregnancy. Int J Surg Case Rep 5(11):787–788.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Corioni S, Perelli F, Bianchi C, Cozzolino M, Maggio L, Masini G et al (2015) Interstitial pregnancy treated with a single-dose of systemic methotrexate: a successful management. J Res Med Sci 20(3):312–316.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kim TH, Lee HH (2015) Pseudocyst development after treatment for interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54(1):107–108.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Singh N, Tripathi R, Mala Y, Batra A (2015) Diagnostic dilemma in cornual pregnancy- 3D ultrasonography may aid!! J Clin Diagn Res 9(1):QD12–QD13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kahramanoglu I, Mammadov Z, Turan H, Urer A, Tuten A (2017) Management options for interstitial ectopic pregnancies: a case series. Pak J Med Sci 33(2):476–482.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Matera C, Veit C (1992) Sonographic evolution of cornual pregnancies treated without surgery. Obstet Gynecol 79(6):1044–1049.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Baker VL, Givens CR, Martin Cadieux MC (1997) Transvaginal reduction of an interstitial heterotopic pregnancy with preservation of the intrauterine gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:1384–1385.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Wilkinson C, Petrucco O, Pachulicz M, Furness M (1998) Interstitial ectopic pregnancy - management with laparoscopically-guided local methotrexate infiltration. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 38(4):434–437.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lin Y, Hwang J, Huang L, Chou C (2002) Conservative treatment for a ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:179.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Oyawoye S, Chander B, Pavlovic B, Hunter J, Gadir AA (2003) Heterotopic pregnancy: successful management with aspiration of cornual/interstitial gestational sac and instillation of small dose of methotrexate. Fetal Diagn Ther 18(1):1–4.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Chou MM, Tseng JJ, Yi YC, Chen WC, Ho ES (2005) Diagnosis of an interstitial pregnancy with 4-dimensional volume contrast imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(4):1551–1553.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Narang L, Kalu G (2009) Laparoscopic salpingocentesis using methotrexate in combination with oral mifepristone for successful treatment of interstitial pregnancy: a case report. Fertil Steril 92(6):2038 e5–2038 e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Andres MP, Campillos JM, Lapresta M, Lahoz I, Crespo R, Tobajas J (2012) Management of ectopic pregnancies with poor prognosis through ultrasound guided intrasacular injection of methotrexate, series of 14 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):529–533.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Swank ML, Harken TR, Porto M (2013) Management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies with a combined intra-amniotic and systemic approach. Obstet Gynecol 122(2 Pt 2):461–464.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Yu Y, Xu W, Xie Z, Huang Q, Li S (2014) Management and outcome of 25 heterotopic pregnancies in Zhejiang, China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 180:157–161.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Macaes A, Fernandes S, Rodrigues C, Branco M (2015) Interstitial ectopic pregnancy managed with local methotrexate. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-212563.

  93. 93.

    Leggieri C, Guasina F, Casadio P, Arena A, Pilu G, Seracchioli R (2016) Hysteroscopic methotrexate injection under ultrasonographic guidance for interstitial pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(7):1195–1199.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H (2006) Management of patients with ectopic pregnancy with massive hemoperitoneum by laparoscopic surgery with intraoperative autologous blood transfusion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):43–48.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Sahoo S, Jose J, Shah N, Opemuyi I (2008) Recurrent cornual ectopic pregnancies. Gynecol Surg 6(4):389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Poon LC, Emmanuel E, Ross JA, Johns J (2014) How feasible is expectant management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43(3):317–321.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Steadman H (1956) Ruptured interstitial pregnancy following homolateral salpingectomy. Obstet Gynecol 7(5):572–575.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Bickerstaff H (1957) Homolateral interstitial pregnancy following salpingectomy. Obstet Gynecol 10(4):422–424.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Farabow W, Cater C, Brame R (1969) Interstitial pregnancy: presentation of two cases and review of salient clinical features. South Med J 62:859–862.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Iuchtman M, Grunstein S (1987) Acute abdomen in ruptured interstitial pregnancy following unilateral salpingectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 26:165–168.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Hill GA, Segars JH, Herbert CM (1989) Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy. J Gynecol Surg 5:209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Reich H, McGlynn F, Budin R, Tsoutsoplides G, DeCaprio J (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of ruptured interstitial pregnancy. J Gynecol Surg 6(2):135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    de Boer C, van Dongen P, Willemsen W, Klapwijk C (1992) Ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47:164–166.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Pelosi M (1994) Successful taparoscopic removal of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1(4):S28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Laury D (1995) Laparoscopic treatment of an interstitial pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2:219–212.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Sherer DM, Scibetta JJ, Sanko SR (1995) Heterotopic quadruplet gestation with laparoscopic resection of ruptured interstitial pregnancy and subsequent successful outcome of triplets. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:216–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Tulandi T, Vilos G, Gomel V (1995) Laparoscopic treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 85(3):465–467.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Woodland M, DePasquale S, Molinari J, Sagullo C (1996) Laparoscopic approach to interstitial pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 3(3):439–441.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Katz Z, Lurie S (1997) Laparoscopic cornuostomy in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy with subsequent hysterosalpingography. BJOG 104:955–956.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Grobman WA, Milad MP (1998) Conservative laparoscopic management of a large cornual ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 13(7):2002–2004.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Kasum M, Grizelj V, Simunic V (1998) Combined interstitial and intrauterine pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 13(6):1547–1549.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Crvenkoviæ G, Barišiæ D, Æorušiæ A, Nola M (1999) Laparoscopic management of the cornual pregnancy. Croatian Med J 40(1).

  113. 113.

    Rahimi M (1999) A new laparoscopic approach for the treatment of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(2):205–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Vicino M, Loverro G, Resta L, Bettocchi S, Vimercati A, Selvaggi L (2000) Laparoscopic cornual excision in a viable large interstitial pregnancy without blood flow detected by color Doppler ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 74(2):407–409.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Ayoubi J-M, Fanchin R, Fo O, Fernandez H, Pons J-C (2001) Tubal curettage: a new conservative treatment for haemorrhagic interstitial pregnancies: case report. Hum Reprod 16(4):780–781.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Dumesic DA, Damario MA, Session DR (2001) Interstitial heterotopic pregnancy in a woman conceiving by in vitro fertilization after bilateral salpingectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 76(1):90–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Kun W, Tung W (2001) On the look out for a rarity: interstitial/cornual pregnancy. Eur J Emerg Med 8:147–150.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Osuga Y, Tsutsumi O, Fujiwara T, Kugu K, Fujimoto A, Taketani Y (2001) Usefulness of long-jaw forceps in laparoscopic cornual resection of interstitial pregnancies. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 8(3):429–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    DeWitt C, Abbott J (2002) Interstitial pregnancy: a potential for misdiagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with emergency department ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med 40(1):106–109.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Sills ES, Perloe M, Kaplan CR, Sweitzer CL, Morton PC, Tucker MJ (2002) Uncomplicated pregnancy and normal singleton delivery after surgical excision of heterotopic (cornual) pregnancy following in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:181–184.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Chang Y, Lee JN, Yang CH, Hsu SC, Tsai EM (2003) An unexpected quadruplet heterotopic pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy and replacement of three embryos. Fertil Steril 80(1):218–220.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Habek D, Mrcela M, Rubin M, Hrgovic Z (2003) Ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:170–172.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Izquierdo LA, Nicholas MC (2003) Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography of interstitial pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 31(9):484–487.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Katz DL, Barrett JP, Sanfilippo JS, Badway DM (2003) Combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(4):1113–1114.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Yoo E-H, Chun S-H, Kim J-I (2003) Endoscopic treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:189–191.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Gezer A, Mutlu H (2004) Laparoscopic management of cornual pregnancy without sutures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270(3):194–196.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Grimbizis G (2004) Case report: laparoscopic treatment of a ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Reprod BioMed Online 9(4):447–451.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Lee GS, Hur SY, Kown I, Shin JC, Kim SP, Kim SJ (2005) Diagnosis of early intramural ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 33(4):190–192.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Savvidou MD, Setchell TE, Sieunarine K, Smith JR (2006) Conservative surgical management of ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(5):629–631.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Thakur Y, Coker A, Morris J, Oliver R (2004) Laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transcervical evacuation of cornual ectopic pregnancy: an alternative approach. J Obstet Gynaecol 24(7):809–810.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Zhang X, Liu X, Fan H (2004) Interstitial pregnancy and transcervical curettage. Obstet Gynecol 104(5 Pt 2):1193–1195.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Huang MC, Su TH, Lee MY (2005) Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 88(1):51–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Kumakiri J, Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kubo M et al (2005) Interstitial pregnancy with huge adenomyosis uteri managed laparoscopically by using pre-operative and intra-operative imaging: case report. BJOG 112(11):1578–1580.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Ross R, Lindheim SR, Olive DL, Pritts EA (2006) Cornual gestation: a systematic literature review and two case reports of a novel treatment regimen. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):74–78.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Ko ML, Jeng CJ, Chou CS, She BC, Chen SC, Tzeng CR (2007) Laparoscopic electrodessication of an interstitial pregnancy. Fertil Steril 88(3):705 e19–705 e20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Lee W, Chen C, Chang T, Chen R, Chow S. Interstitial pregnancy with a retained intrauterine device. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2007;46(4):442–4.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Oliver R, Malik M, Coker A, Morris J (2007) Management of extra-tubal and rare ectopic pregnancies: case series and review of current literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276(2):125–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Lialios GA, Kallitsaris A, Kabisios T, Messinis IE (2008) Ruptured heterotopic interstitial pregnancy: rare case of acute abdomen in a Jehovah's Witness patient. Fertil Steril 90(4):1200 e15–1200 e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Qin L, Li S, Tan S (2008) Laparoscopic loop ligature for selective therapy in heterotopic interstitial and intrauterine pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 101(1):80–81.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Sherer DM, Dalloul M, Sokolovski M, Borawski D, Granderson F, Abulafia O (2009) Interstitial pregnancy undetected during earlier first-trimester screening for fetal aneuploidy at 13 weeks’ gestation. J Clin Ultrasound 37(3):168–170.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Casadio P, Formelli G, Spagnolo E, De Angelis D, Marra E, Armillotta F et al (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of interstitial twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92(1):390 e13–390 e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Cheng Z, Xu L, Zhu Y, Dai H, Qu X, Gong J (2009) Laparoscopic uterine vessels occlusion for the treatment of interstitial pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(4):509–512.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Choi YS, Eun DS, Choi J, Shin KS, Choi JH, Park HD (2009) Laparoscopic cornuotomy using a temporary tourniquet suture and diluted vasopressin injection in interstitial pregnancy. Fertil Steril 91(5):1933–1937.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Duong D, Baker WE, Adedipe A (2009) Clinician-performed ultrasound diagnosis of ruptured interstitial pregnancy. Am J Emerg Med 27(9):1170 e1–1170 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Pluchino N, Ninni F, Angioni S, Carmignani A, Genazzani AR, Cela V (2009) Spontaneous cornual pregnancy after homolateral salpingectomy for an earlier tubal pregnancy: a case report and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(2):208–211.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Pan J, Qian Y, Wang J (2010) Bilateral interstitial pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer with bilateral fallopian tube resection detected by transvaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 29:1829–1832.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Pistofidis G, Bardis NS, Koukoura OG, Balinakos P (2010) Spontaneous intraoperative rupture of interstitial pregnancy. Laparoscopic management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(6):191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Pellegrino M, Pontrelli G, Martulli B, Tsin DA (2010) Laparoscopical management of cornual pregnancies: a report of three cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 151(2):199–202.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Vignali M, Bertazzoli E, Natale A, Alabiso G, Barbisetti De Prun A, Ciocca E (2010) Three cases of interstitial tubal pregnancy after ipsilateral salpingectomy for a previous ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(6):158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Walid MS, Heaton RL (2010) Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 8. https://doi.org/10.3205/000105.

  151. 151.

    Yan CM (2010) Laparoscopic management of three rare types of ectopic pregnancy. Hong Kong Med J 16(2):132–136.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Aust T, O'Neill A, Cario G (2011) Purse-string suture technique to enable laparoscopic management of the interstitial gestation of a heterotopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 95(1):261–263.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Cervino E, Ramon YCCL, Perez P, Couceiro E (2011) Ultrasound-guided transcervical evacuation of interstitial twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril 96(4):927–930.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Chachan S, Waters N, Kent A (2011) Laparoscopic management of cornual heterotopic pregnancy with the use of Harmonic ACE®—a case report. Gynecol Surg 8(2):243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Lazard A, Poizac S, Courbiere B, Cravello L, Gamerre M, Agostini A. Cornual resection for interstitial pregnancy by laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Fertil Steril 2011;95(7):2432 e5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Lodhi W, Andersen K, Yoong W (2011) Laparoscopic cornuectomy revisited: a case series of 3 patients using the Multifire Endo GIA Stapler. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159(2):477–478.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Yamamoto MP, Zaritsky EF (2011) Total laparoscopic management of a 13 week cornual ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Ahsan Akhtar M, Izzat F, Keay SD (2012) Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy with automatic stapler. BMJ Case Rep 2012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-006851.

    Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Cucinella G, Rotolo S, Calagna G, Granese R, Agrusa A, Perino A (2012) Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy: the “purse-string” technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(8):996–999.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Garavaglia E, Quaranta L, Pasi F, Redaelli A, Colombo G, Candiani M (2012) Interstitial pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer following bilateral salpingectomy: report of two cases and literature review. Int J Fertil Steril 6(2):131–134.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Muglu J, Uchil D, Sau A, Zamblera D, Jolaoso A (2012) Recurrent uterine rupture after laparoscopic surgery for interstitial ectopic pregnancy. J Gynecol Surg 28(2):169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Rheinboldt M, Ibrahim S (2013) Atypical presentation of a large interstitial pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 20(3):251–254.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Mackenna A, Fernandez E, Fernandez C (2013) Treatment of interstitial pregnancy by laparoscopic cornual resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(4):406–407.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Mooij R, van Dillen J (2013) Een jonge vrouw met acute buikpijn. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 157:A5496.

  165. 165.

    Warda H, Mamik MM, Ashraf M, Abuzeid MI (2013) Laparoscopic cornuostomy for a large interstitial ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):742–743.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Wright SD, Busbridge RC, Gard GB (2013) A conservative and fertility preserving treatment for interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53(2):211–213.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Zhang K, Yuan P (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal cornual resection for the treatment of large interstitial pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 23(9):783–786.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Chandran JR (2014) Cornual pregnancy and its management: a case report. IJSS Case Reports & Reviews 1(6):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Garretto D, Lee LN, Budorick NE, Figueroa R (2015) Interstitial twin pregnancy: a unique case presentation. J Clin Ultrasound 43(7):447–450.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Nezhat CH, Dun EC (2014) Laparoscopically-assisted, hysteroscopic removal of an interstitial pregnancy with a fertility-preserving technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(6):1091–1094.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Wang YL, Weng SS, Huang WC, Su TH (2014) Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancies in unusual locations. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 53(4):466–470.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Warda H, Mamik MM, Ashraf M, Abuzeid MI (2014) Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: conservative surgical management. JSLS 18(2):197–203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Ansari A, Ahmad S, James J, Jeppson C, Holloway R (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection of cornual ectopic pregnancy a case report. J Reprod Med 60(1):58–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Afifi Y, Mahmud A, Fatma A (2016) Hemostatic techniques for laparoscopic management of cornual pregnancy: double-impact devascularization technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(2):274–280.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Grindler NM, Ng J, Tocce K, Alvero R (2016) Considerations for management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies: two case reports. J Med Case Rep 10(1):106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Jeon JH, Hwang YI, Shin IH, Park CW, Yang KM, Kim HO (2016) The risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of 48 cases of heterotopic pregnancy from a single center. J Korean Med Sci 31(7):1094–1099.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kim MJ, Jung YW, Cha JH, Seok HH, Han JE, Seong SJ et al (2016) Successful management of heterotopic cornual pregnancy with laparoscopic cornual resection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:199–203.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Mallick R, Ajala T (2016) A new technique in the laparoscopic resection of cornual ectopic pregnancies: a case series. Gynecol Surg 13(3):147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Said TH (2016) Laparoscopic management of interstitial ectopic using simple and safe technique: case series and review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol India 66(Suppl 1):482–487.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Xu Y, Lu Y, Chen H, Li D, Zhang J, Zheng L (2016) Heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer after bilateral total salpingectomy/tubal ligation: case report and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(3):338–345.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Hamada S, Nakah O, Morideh N, Higuchih K, Takahashih H (1997) Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in a patient with an unruptured interstitial pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:107–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Sungurtekin U, Uyar Y (1998) Recurrent interstitial pregnancy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 38(4):438–440.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Bremner T, Cela V, Luciano AA (2000) Surgical management of interstitial pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 7(3):387–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Coric M, Barisic D, Strelec M (2004) Laparoscopic approach to interstitial pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270(4):287–289.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Vilos GA (2001) Laparoscopic ligation and resection of two ipsilateral interstitial pregnancies in the same patient. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 8(2):299–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Siow A, Ng S (2011) Laparoscopic management of 4 cases of recurrent cornual ectopic pregnancy and review of literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(3):296–302.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

Search results and supplementary tables are available on line. The dataset is available with the primary author.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IV, FD, PJB, DT, AVH, SAC, ASVR, LVDH, SG, CT, and JDP did the clinical management of the patients involved. IV and FD did the data collection. IV and JDP did the data analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Deprest.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

JD was a fundamental clinical researcher for the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (2001–2016). He is now funded by the Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity Fund, London, UK.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Both patients explicitly consented to have their history being part of a case report. This study is approved by the Education-Support Committee of The University of Leuven (OBC MP001948). The Education-Support Committee (OBC) evaluates master’s thesis projects as mandated by the Research Ethics Committee of the KU/UZ Leuven.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 6 Primary systemic MTX treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Appendix 2

Table 7 Primary local medical treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Appendix 3

Table 8 Secondary/tertiary systemic/local medical treatment of interstitial treatment

Appendix 4

Table 9 Primary surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Appendix 5

Table 10 Secondary/tertiary surgical treatment of interstitial pregnancy

Appendix 6

Table 11 Recurrent interstitial pregnancy and its treatment

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verbeeck, I., Donders, F., Buyck, P. et al. Elective uterine artery embolization prior to laparoscopic resection of interstitial pregnancy: two cases and literature review. Gynecol Surg 15, 18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-018-1049-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Interstitial pregnancy
  • Embolization
  • Laparoscopy
  • Cornual resection
  • Cornuostomy